Dejan Ilijevski

The simple answer is that you shouldn't. First, you can probably do better than the 1% asset management fee. Second, if you have the emotional strength to remain disciplined and rebalance when necessary, then you may not need an advisor. Educated, disciplined, and do-it-yourself investors can construct efficient portfolios using low-cost index funds. Vanguard is a great option. Consider starting with a simple three-fund portfolio of Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund, Vanguard Total International Stock Market Index Fund, and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund. With this portfolio you'll end up doing better then most of your peers (and better than most active advisors) over the long term.

If you do work with an advisor, or even if you invest on your own, dont' fall for speculation nonsense, they are just cost-generating gimmicks. The idea that profesionals know what the market is going to do tomorrow based on this, that, or the other is for your benefit so that you feel like you are getting your money's worth. There have been more than 4 decades of data that show that speculation is a myth (market guru grades; investment bank grades). In fact over the long-term it ends up being detrimental to your returns, although quite profitable for your advisor. Don't pay for supposed skill.

Finally, if you do need comprehensive financial planning on top of investment management advice, you'll end up paying more. Most CFPs that I know and work with charge extra for financial planning. Many are moving to a flat-fee monthly container model inclusive of all services, including AUM. If you only need investment management, look for a fiduciary, fee-only advisor; they must work in your best interest, which also includes minimizing costs. Good luck.

First, to help your odds of success in the long term, focus only on actions that add value. You can't control the market, and no one can predict what it will do tomorrow. For that you need a crystal ball. So, forget about sector, stock, time, manager, or any other market attribute picking. Speculation does not add value to your long-term success.

Defining market dips is a form of time picking (market timing). As someone already usefully pointed out, how do you define a market dip? It really is dependent on your time frame. There are market dips every minute, hour, day, week, month, year, decade, etc. How do you choose which time resolution to use for your trade triggers? It's impossible, that's why market timing doesn't work. 

Instead, if you already know the right balance of stocks and bonds for your portfolio (based on your risk tolerance), then don't worry about what the market is doing. Simply continue to contribute to your account on a regular time interval (known as dollar cost averaging) regardless of whether the market is hitting new highs or recent lows. Then every quarter or so, check whether your portfolio conforms to your target allocation of stocks and bonds. If it's really off whack, then rebalance to get it back to your target levels.

Finally, you don't need to pay financial professionals more or for expensive funds in order to get better returns. On the contrary, the lower the fees, usually much higher are your odds of success. Cost-generating gimmicks like market-timing, stock picking, frequent trading, and other conventional strategies only guarantee that more wealth will trickle up from your account to the pockets of your broker/advisor. Don't pay for gimmicks and proven myths. Be disciplined for the long haul and stick with low-cost index funds. Good luck.

First, full disclosure, I am not an insurance broker, I don't sell insurance products of any kind, and the only insurance product that I have ever purchased myself is a term policy.

My recommendation to you would be to also only consider term life insurance. Like you already are aware, it is not only cheaper, but it also separates your investments from your insurance. There is absolutely no way that an insurance/annuity firm can provide you with the diversity, quality, and cost of investment portfolios that you have the freedom to seek out yourself from Vanguard, Dimensional, and from reputable fee-only fiduciary advisors. Get your term insurance from an insurance firm or from a fee only insurance agent, then use the savings over whole/universal life to fund your retirement with a legitimate, well-diversified, low-cost investment portfolio. Generally, the more complicated a product is, whether insurance or investment, the less it makes sense. Complicated products are usually created so that financial professionals can generate more fees. 

Also ask about tiered terms. By tiered I mean that you may be able to purchase smaller 10, 20, 30 year term policies so that as you get older the shorter terms drop off, leaving your with lower premiums and lower coverage (so you have the most coverage when you need it most, in middle age). Again, I am not an insurance agent, so please talk to one that can provide more info.

Finally, based on the summary of your finances and goals, that 1M policy may be a bit much. Sure, you want your family to be taken care of well in case the worst happens. However, if there is significant difference in the premiums, you may be able to better plan for your family's future by getting the right coverage amount, then investing the cost savings in your retirement and college savings portfolios. Good luck.

Yes, you absolutely can. Sometimes this is referred to as scalping. The better question is whether you should. There are a few points to seriously consider. First, trading can seem fun and the opportunity to beat the market (thousands of others) exciting. However, as an independent day trader competing from home, the extremely high likelihood is that you will not win. Remember that you will be competing against the professionals who use the latest technology, co-located servers, and immediate news aggregation services. Even most of them fail. And, when you do get filled, it'll also be likely that an institution may be on the other side. I don't like your chances. 

Secondly, the backtested results of your algorithm will be misleading. Backtesting can't exactly mimic the real world market mechanics. The simulator may record you being filled. In reality, you can't be sure that you will pay .770 for the stock, then sell it at .775. Sure, you may have working bids and offers; however even if the market trades at your price you can't be sure that you get filled (might be at the back of the stack), unless the price totally clears. Most importantly, if there really was an edge simply taking half ticks out of this market, competition would have priced it out a long time ago, especially now with high-frequency, low-latency trading. I think that most of the time you'll simply be stuck trying to scratch your position, and usually will end up having to puke (take a loss).

Finally, decades of data, economic theory, and real-world evidence suggest that stock-picking as an investment strategy does not work. Even the professional money managers can't consistently beat the markets, so why try? I get it, it's fun to be part of the game. If you watch the financial news channels it would seem that every day is an opportunity to make profits. If you do trade, make sure it's only with money that you can lose and not have it affect your lifestyle or retirement goals. I also recommend you read a bit about behavioral finance. People tend to have a harder time accepting losses then they do gains, in which case when you trade for real you'll probably hold on to your losers longer, hoping for a comeback, deviating from your strategy. Be aware of this and other biases and try to remain disciplined. If you have any specific questions about trading, please let me know. Good luck.