Rick Konrad

CFP®, CFA
Personal Finance, Retirement, Investing
93%
Helpful
15
Answers
1
Articles
18
Followers
“With over 40 years of experience and as a founding partner of Blueprint Financial Planning, LLC, Rick Konrad is committed to providing investment and retirement planning advice to his clients.”
Firm:

Blueprint Financial Planning LLC

Job Title:

Managing Partner

Biography:

Rick Konrad co-founded Blueprint Financial in 2001 and also founded Value Architects Asset Management. Prior to this, he was the Managing Director of Research for Ryan Beck & Co. He has extensive experience in investment management, having been a partner in Lincluden Management, a Canadian private asset manager with over $7 billion under management, as well as Sceptre Investment Counsel in Toronto where he was responsible for a $2 billion US mandate.

He is a graduate of University of Western Ontario in Canada, and received his MSF from Northeastern University. He received his CFA charter in 1988, his CFP® designation in 2004, and has completed the Harvard Business School Executive Program on behavioral investing.

Rick has been a member of the University of Western Ontario’s investment committee since 2008 as well as a member of its Board of Governors. He also has served on the Shareholder Advisory Council to Sallie Mae, the nation’s leading provider of student loans where he was involved in initiating changes in financial reporting and securitization as well as a change in senior management of the company. In his free time,  Rick is an adjunct instructor of retirement planning at NYU.

Education:

MS, Finance, Northeastern University
BA, Biophysics, University of Western Ontario

Fee Structure:

Asset-Based

CRD Number:

4663223

All Articles
Sort By:
Most Helpful
January 2017
    Investing, Stocks

All Answers
Sort By:
Most Helpful
    Stocks
What is the most efficient and valuable method to value a stock?
71% of people found this answer helpful

You have asked an excellent fundamental question, how should we value a stock? Let's look at each of the approaches you have raised.

Book value is merely an accounting value. It reflects the difference between asset value (based on historical costs) less the debts and other prior liabilities. So, if the historical asset value based on the original cost does not reflect the current value, it can be a very misleading statistic. For example, many integrated steel companies had very high cost assets based on their historical valuation, yet were no longer economic and produced little cash flow or earnings. Companies like this traded at a discount to their book value, but were not really bargain investments. One other accounting wrinkle that I should mention. When companies are buying back a lot of stock at prices that exceed their book value, these actions actually reduce the book value. Consequently, there are many companies that have had active share repurchase programs where the book value can even be negative. Yet, many of these companies continue to grow revenues, cash flows, dividends, and earnings. There are other companies which may have understated values, for example, raw land that has appreciated over time, but is still reflected "on the books" for its original cost. So, book value is not a reliable determinant of valuation.

Enterprise value takes into account the stock market's assessment of the value ( the stock market price) plus the debt of the company less any cash holdings of the business. It's as if you were buying the entire business, paying off all the shareholders, as well as the debt holders, but you would finance part of this transaction with the company's own cash holdings.The cash is subtracted because it would reduce the cost of buying the entire business. Sometimes, one can find stocks with negative enterprise value, that is, the cash on the balance sheet exceeds the valuation of the rest of the business. This can be helpful in finding bargains.

The discounted cash flow method is one of the most commonly used approaches by professional analysts and investors. As others have described, it does determine the value of a business by taking a present value of all future cash flows from the business and adjusts these for the liabilities. However, there is "art" in using this tool. One must be able to make reasonable assumptions about the future profitability of the business and obviously that can change with competition and obsolescence. One must make assumptions about what sort of discount rate to use. That discount rate reflects not only the "cost of money," or the cost of financing, but your desired rate of return. In other words, how much return would you expect from this sort of a business. If a business has a highly predictable cash flow, you probably would demand a lower return. On the other hand, if the cash flows were somewhat unpredictable, or competition in the industry was rampant, you would want a higher rate of return, so your discount rate should be higher.

Most advisors do not attempt to value individual securities, but prefer to utilize professional active investors through Separately Managed Accounts or mutual funds or alternatively, use passive investing approaches. Proper security analysis requires education that goes beyond the scope of Series 7 holders or even CFP certificants. Individual investors should be mindful of the risks associated with security selection and inadequate diversification.

The discounted cash flow approach is the best tool that we have to determine "intrinsic value," but it does rely on assumptions which may be unrealistic and discount rates which depend on an assessment of the riskiness of the cash flow.

December 2016
    Bonds / Fixed Income
Is it possible to short sell a bond?
67% of people found this answer helpful
January 2017
    Investing, Asset Allocation, Real Estate
How can I identify REITs that will help my income grow over the long term?
64% of people found this answer helpful
January 2017
    401(k)
Can my company withdraw half of my 401(k)?
60% of people found this answer helpful
October 2016
    Investing
Can a company have an extremely high gross margin and negative operating margin at the same time?
57% of people found this answer helpful
August 2016