Which is the better strategy when dealing with my rental homes?

Investing, Asset Allocation, Real Estate
Answers
Sort By:
Most Helpful
April 2017
100% of people found this answer helpful

Hi. The decision to sell the properties should consider your expected appreciation rate of the homes. It looks like Lake Charles homes have experienced a rate of appreciation about matching inflation over the last couple of decades. To gain a better-informed perspective of potential near-term appreciation prospects in the area, I'd look at the level of building permits being granted (supply)  against the population growth the area is experiencing (a proxy for demand- households is a better measure for housing demand but population is where that starts). My guess is that near-term appreciation will be modest but you should take a look.

Looking at your situation from a return on equity viewpoint, unless substantial appreciation is expected in the reasonable future, your equity in house #1 should be re-deployed. If satisfactory appreciation is expected, you can still keep the property and better put your equity to work elsewhere in a tax efficient way by borrowing against the free and clear house, although it sounds like your rental rate is unattractive since you're only breaking even with no debt. Regarding house #2, The negative cash flow is not acceptable unless, again, there is enticing appreciation potential. Some things you can consider to remedy the negative cash flow are to consider the potential to refinance your loan for a better rate if you don't already have a good one. Also, a good professional management company is worth its weight in gold. You will, of course, pay them something like 8-10% of collected rents, but they can more than pay for themselves by maximizing rent rate. The key, again, is working with a very good manager.

If you were to sell both properties the sum of the outcome would be basically gaining $800 per month (by virtue of eliminating that negative cash flow). In essence, you would have created $9,600 per year in income with no capital required. That's not a bad option.

To sum up:

  1. Form an opinion on appreciation potential of your properties.
  2. Explore ways to reduce/remove the negative cash flow from property #2 while retaining ownership (pending #1 above).
  3. Redeploy your idle equity in house #1 either by borrowing against the property or selling it (can consider a 1031 exchange here).
  4. With lackluster appreciation potential for both properties (at least 6% on property #2 to offset the negative cash flow loss) and if the rents cannot be increased, the liquidation of both properties with the net affect of ending with about zero equity but eliminating the negative cash flow is a decent option.

Real estate is a fantastic asset. I've purchased more than 100 homes and we invest in apartment properties for our investors. However, like any asset, it must be bought well for the greatest likelihood of a happy outcome. Don't let this poor experience dissuade you from the benefits of direct real estate ownership. Good luck!

May 2017
April 2017