Economies that are afflicted by a high level of corruption -- which involves the misuse of power, whether in the form of money or authority, in order to achieve certain goals in illegal, dishonest or unfair ways -- are not capable of prospering as fully as those with a low level of corruption. Corrupted economies are just not able to function properly because corruption prevents the natural laws of the economy from functioning freely. As a result, corruption in a nation's political and economic operations causes its entire society to suffer. According to the World Bank, the average income in countries with a high level of corruption is about a third of that of countries with a low level of corruption. Also, the infant mortality rate in such countries is about 3 times higher and the literacy rate is 25% lower. No country has been able to completely eliminate corruption, but studies show that the level of corruption in countries with emerging market economies is much higher than it is in developed countries. (For related reading, see: Should You Invest In Emerging Markets?)  The map below illustrates the varying levels of corruption perception in different countries, with darker colors representing higher levels of corruption perception in 2014 in a continuum that ranges from low corruption (light colors) to high corruption levels. Based on this map we see that the regions with developed economies -- North America, Western Europe and Australia -- are characterized by low levels of corruption. In contrast, a high perception of corruption is reported in almost all countries with emerging economies.

Corruption in its many forms (bribery, nepotism, fraud, embezzlement) adversely impacts the economies and societies of affected nations. The following table features countries and shows the relationship between their ranks in relation to their CPI. 

Most Corrupt Countries | FindTheBest

Least Corrupt Countries | FindTheBest

Artificially high prices and low quality (of products and services)

Corruption in the way deals are made, contracts are awarded, or economic operations are carried out, leads to monopolies or oligopolies in the economy. (See: Economics Basics: Monopolies, Oligopolies and Perfect Competition.) Those business owners who can use their connections or money to bribe government officials can manipulate policies and market mechanisms to ensure they are the sole provider of goods or services in the market. Monopolists, because they do not have to compete against alternative providers, tend to keep their prices high and are not impelled to improve the quality of goods or services they provide by market forces that would have been in operation if they had significant competition. Embedded in those high prices are also the illegal costs of the corrupt transactions that were necessary to create such a monopoly. If, for example, a home construction company had to pay bribes to officials to be granted licenses for operations, these costs incurred will, of course, be reflected in artificially high housing prices.

Inefficient allocation of resources

In best practice companies choose their suppliers via tender processes (request for tender or request for proposal) which serve as mechanisms to enable the selection of suppliers that offer the best combination of price and quality. This ensures the efficient allocation of resources. In corrupted economies the companies that otherwise would not be qualified to win the tenders, are oftentimes awarded projects as a result of unfair or illegal tenders (e.g. tenders that involve kickbacks). This results in excessive expenditure in the execution of projects, and substandard or failed projects etc., that lead to overall inefficiency in the use of resources. Public procurement perhaps is most vulnerable to fraud and corruption due to the large size of financial flows involved (OECD). It’s estimated that in most countries public procurement constitutes between 15% and 30% of GDP

Uneven distribution of wealth

Corrupted economies are characterized by a disproportionately small middle class and significant divergence between the living standards of the upper class and lower class.(For a profile of the middle class in the US, see article: Are We Losing the Middle Class?)  Because most of the country's capital is aggregated in the hands of oligarchs or persons who back corrupted public officials, most of the created wealth also flows to these individuals. Small entrepreneurs are not widely spread and are usually discouraged because they face unfair competition and illegal pressures by large companies who are connected with government officials.

Low stimulus for technology advancement

Because little confidence can be placed in the legal system of corrupted economies in which legal judgments can be rigged, potential innovators cannot be certain that their invention will be protected by patents and will not be copied by those who are not afraid of being subject to punitive measures by the authorities, because they can bribe these authorities. (For related reading, see: Patents Are Assets, So Learn How To Value Them.) There is thus a disincentive for innovation, and as a result emerging countries are usually the importers of technology, because such technology is not created within their own societies.

Shadow economy (or shadow market)

Small entrepreneurs tend to avoid having their businesses officially registered with tax authorities to avoid taxation. As a result the income generated by many businesses exists outside the official economy, and thus are not subject to state taxation and are not included in the calculation of the country's GDP. (See: The GDP And Its Importance.) Another negative effect of shadow businesses is that they usually pay their employees lower wages than the minimum amount designated by the government and they do not provide acceptable working conditions (including appropriate health insurance benefits) for employees. (For related reading, see article: Countries With The Largest Shadow Markets.)

Low attractiveness for foreign investors and international trade

Corruption is one of the disincentives for foreign investment. Investors who seek a transparent and fair, competitive business environment will avoid investing in countries where there is a high level of corruption. Studies show that there is a direct link between the level of corruption in a country and measurements of the competitiveness of its business environment. The following table features a small sample of countries and shows the relationship between their ranks in competitiveness and their corruption index.

Low-quality education and healthcare provision

A working paper of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) published in 2010 shows that corruption has an adverse impact on the quality of education and healthcare that are provided in countries with emerging economies. Corruption increases the cost of healthcare and education services through illegal and unofficial payments that are made in countries where bribery and connections play an important role in the recruitment and promotion of teachers. As a result, the quality of education decreases. Also, corruption in the designation of healthcare providers and recruitment of personnel, as well as the procurement of medical supplies and equipment, in emerging economies results in inadequate healthcare treatment and a substandard, or restricted, medical supply, and thus lowers the overall quality of healthcare in these countries.

The Bottom Line

Most countries with emerging economies suffer from a high level of corruption that slows their overall development. The entire society is affected as a result of the inefficient allocation of resources, the presence of a shadow economy,and low-quality education and healthcare. Corruption thus makes these societies worse off and lowers the living standards of most of their populations.

Want to learn how to invest?

Get a free 10 week email series that will teach you how to start investing.

Delivered twice a week, straight to your inbox.