The question of whether flipping or buying and holding real estate is the best strategy for investing in property doesn't have one correct answer. Rather, the decision to choose one method over the other should be part of an explicit strategic plan that considers your overall goals. You should also take into consideration the opportunities presented by the existing market. Here is a look at what is involved in pursuing each strategy, and how to decide which one might be right for you.

Key Takeaways

  • Flipping properties versus buying and holding real estate represent two different investment strategies.
  • Owning real estate offers investors the opportunity to accumulate wealth over time and to avoid the ups and downs of the stock market.
  • Flipping can provide a quick turnaround on your investment and avoids the ongoing hassles of finding tenants and maintaining a property, but costs and taxes can be high.
  • Buy-and-hold properties provide passive monthly income and tax advantages, but not everyone is prepared for the management and legal responsibilities of being a landlord.

Why Invest in Real Estate?

That's a good question. Residential real estate ownership is gaining ever-increasing interest from retail investors for many of the following reasons:

  • Real estate provides more predictable returns than stocks and bonds.
  • Real estate provides an inflation hedge because rental rates and investment cash flow usually rise by at least as much as the inflation rate.
  • Real estate provides an excellent place for capital in times when you're unsure of prospects in the stock and bond markets or when investors expect long-term returns in equities, debt instruments, and other assets to be inadequate.
  • The equity created in a real estate investment provides an excellent base for financing other investment opportunities. Instead of borrowing to get the capital to invest (i.e., buying stocks on margin), investors can borrow against their equity to finance other projects. The relative ease in borrowing against a real estate investment, combined with the deductibility of the mortgage interest, makes this option a less-expensive method for financing other opportunities for investors who are comfortable taking on additional financial risk.
  • In addition to providing cash flow for owners, residential real estate can also be used as a home or for some other purpose (obviously, not at the same time).

Passive vs. Active Income

One key distinction between buying and holding and flipping properties is that the former can provide you with passive income, while the latter provides active income. Passive income is money that comes to you each month, wherever you are, from your investments. It could be from stocks and bonds or from owning rental property and receiving rental income each month, provided you hire a management company to do all the required tasks, such as finding tenants, collecting rent, and taking care of maintenance.

Active income is money that you earn—your salary from work is one example, flipping houses is another. Flipping is considered active income because whether or not you are doing the physical labor of putting up sheetrock and stripping floors, it is a business that you engage in—finding a property to flip, purchasing it, obtaining insurance, overseeing contractors, managing the project, and more. In this sense, flipping isn't really an investment strategy the way investing in the stock market is. If you have a day job, keep in mind that your off-hours will likely be taken up with all of the demands that flipping a property entails.

Two Ways to Flip Properties

Two major types of properties can be used in a buy/sell approach to real estate investing. The first is houses or apartments that can be purchased below current market value because they are in financial distress. The second is the fixer-upper, a property with structural, design, or condition issues that can be overcome to create value.

Investors who focus on distressed properties do so by identifying homeowners who can no longer manage or sustain their properties or by finding properties that are overleveraged and are at risk of going into default. Those who prefer fixer-uppers, on the other hand, will remodel or enhance a property so that it works better for homeowners or is more efficient for apartment tenants.

Using this tactic, the buyer of a fixer-upper is relying on the invested capital to increase values as opposed to just buying property at a low basis to create high investment returns. Of course, it is possible to combine these two strategies when flipping properties, and many people do just that. However, finding these opportunities can be difficult over a protracted, consistent period of time. For most people, flipping properties should be considered more of a tactical strategy than a long-term investment plan.

The Pros and Cons of Flipping

Pros
  • Faster return on your money

  • Potentially safer investment

Cons
  • Costs

  • Taxes

Pro: Faster return on your money

One big advantage of flipping properties is the ability to realize gains immediately and to have capital tied up for the shortest time possible. The average timeframe for flipping a house is about six months, although first-timers should expect the process to take longer.

Pro: A potentially safer investment

Unlike the stock market, which can turn in the middle of a day, real estate markets are more easily predicted and can produce extended periods that compensate investors for flipping properties. In this sense, flipping properties could be considered a safer investment strategy because it is intended to keep capital at risk for a minimal amount of time and because it lacks the management and leasing risks inherent in holding real estate—not to mention the hassles of finding tenants, collecting rents, and maintaining a property.

Con: Costs

Flipping houses can create costs issues that you don't face with long-term investments. The expenses involved in flipping can demand a lot of money, leading to cash flow problems. Because transaction costs are very high on both the buy and sell side, they can significantly affect profits. Keep in mind, too, that if you are giving up your day job and relying on flipping for your income, you're also giving up a consistent paycheck.

Con: Taxes

The quick turnaround in properties (and speed is everything in successful flipping deals) can create swings in income that can boost your tax bill—especially if things move too fast to take advantage of long-term capital gains tax rules. What this means is that if you own a property for less than a year, you'll have to pay a higher capital gains tax rate based on your earned income.

The Pros and Cons of Buy-and-Hold

Pros
  • Ongoing income

  • Increase in property values

  • Taxes

Cons
  • Vacancy costs

  • Management and legal issues

Pro: Ongoing income

Owning rental property provides you with regular income, no matter where you are or what you are doing. What's more, buying and holding real estate is a known recipe for amassing great wealth. Most "old money" in the U.S. and abroad was accumulated through land ownership. Despite periods of decreasing prices, land values have almost always rebounded in the long run because there is a limited supply of land.

Pro: Increase in property values

The longer you hold your investment property, the more likely you are to benefit from inflation, which will boost the value of the property and allow you to increase the rents you charge. Also, should you decide to sell later on, if you were able to purchase during a buyer's market and sell during a seller's market, there's the potential for realizing a significant return on your investment.

Pro: Taxes

Owning a rental property has tax advantages not available to flippers. Rental property is taxed as investment income, with lower tax rates, and you can write off expenses, which include repairs, maintenance/upkeep, paying a property manager, driving to/from your property, and more. You also can write off any depreciation of your asset. And, should you decide to sell after owning the property for more than a year, you'll pay taxes at the long-term capital gains rate.

Con: Vacancy costs

One of the risks a rental property owner takes on is finding tenants, whether you do it yourself or hire a management company to do it for you. If your property sits empty for months or years at a time, you are responsible for covering the mortgage during that period. Before investing in a buy-and-hold property, you'll want to make sure your budget will cover one to three months of vacancy per year—or put off buying until you do.

Con: Management and legal issues

Long-term real estate ownership is a management-intensive endeavor that is outside the skill set of many investors. Many investors, especially first-time rental property owners, are ill-prepared or ill-equipped to deal with the responsibilities and legal issues that come with being a landlord. The process of finding quality tenants and servicing their needs, along with handling the maintenance and upkeep of the property, can be a stressful and time-intensive undertaking, but successful property management is necessary for ensuring ongoing cash flows from one's investment.

Choosing a Strategy

To decide whether flipping properties or holding them long-term is the most appropriate strategy, you need to answer a few critical questions for yourself. You must decide whether the capital allocation is a permanent or a transient one and whether it is a core part of an overall investment strategy or a means to enhance returns. You also need to determine what risk and return ratio is appropriate for this portion of your investment portfolios and whether you have the appropriate tolerance and skills to take on the management responsibilities that go along with either type of investment.

If the capital is not available to purchase a diversified portfolio, a prospective investor must be prepared to take on unsystematic risk, including individual property risks and potential lack of demand for the property, whether by homeowners or renters. If you're considering a buy-and-sell strategy, you must also determine whether you have the skill to uncover distressed sale properties or fixer-uppers. In this transactional strategy, it's important to determine whether capital can be turned enough times within a given investment period to overcome the transaction costs on both the buy and sell sides, including brokerage, financing, and closing fees.

You can enjoy the benefits of both strategies by developing a business flipping houses and using your profits to invest in buy-and-hold properties that provide long-term rental income.

The Bottom Line

Although the choice between the two strategies in question depends on your particular financial situation and goals, the long-term holding strategy is generally more appropriate for those who use real estate as a core portion of their overall investment portfolios; flipping properties is more appropriate when real estate is used as an adjunct or a return-enhancement tactic.

Investors wishing to amass wealth and to derive income from their real estate investments should consider holding real estate for the long term, using the equity built into the portfolio to finance other investment opportunities, with the potential of eventually selling the properties in an upmarket. Flipping properties is a tactic that is best suited for periods when prospects in the stock and bond markets are low, or for people wishing to realize short-term capital gains for as long as the present market will allow.