Keeping your beneficiary designations up to date is important. A problematic beneficiary designation can be frustrating for everyone involved. Still, updating is effective only if it meets certain requirements. Here are some beneficiary designations that may cause problems alongside ways to avoid them through some simple precautionary steps.
- Having an unclear beneficiary on your retirement account means that it may be up to a probate court to decide who receives your IRA or 401(k) assets when you die.
- It is not, however, necessary to identify each beneficiary by name.
- If a beneficiary phrase is clear, such as “all my surviving children,” it is legally acceptable.
- State laws may automatically name a spouse as default beneficiary for a retirement account.
Designating Unidentifiable Beneficiaries
Your custodian’s inability to identify your beneficiary could result in a delay in your intended beneficiary receiving the assets, and could also cost your beneficiary legal fees if it becomes necessary for the courts to decide who that is. Identifying your beneficiaries by name and relationship to you causes little or no problems for them. However, you do not have to put your beneficiary’s name on your designation form: simply stating “all my surviving children,” for example, is an acceptable beneficiary designation.
In fact, the final required minimum distribution (RMD) regulations state, “A designated beneficiary need not be specified by name in the plan…in order to be a designated beneficiary so long as the individual who is to be the beneficiary is identifiable under the plan,” per Treasury Regulation § 1.401(a)(9)-4, Q&A 1. “All my surviving children” satisfies this requirement.
The designation “all my children” is also acceptable. However, should one of your children predecease you, it raises the question of how that person’s share should be handled. If you want that child’s share to go to his or her heirs, then you must make that intent clear in your beneficiary designation. This can be accomplished by attaching a customized beneficiary designation or by including a per stirpes clause.
If you name a person as a beneficiary of an IRA only in your will, as opposed to as part of the IRA, that person may not be considered a beneficiary by your IRA custodian, because a retirement account is not part of an estate.
Beneficiary Designations and Your Will
Many individual retirement account (IRA) custodians are unwilling to accept beneficiary designations of “as per my will.” In many cases the reluctance is because a will addresses the treatment of assets that are part of an individual’s estate, and a retirement account is not considered to be part of an estate.
While “as per my will” is not a widely accepted designation, the regulation suggests that it conforms to federal guidelines. Before you make such a designation, be sure to check with your IRA custodian. Even in instances where the custodian will accept such a designation, it still may not provide the desired result.
For instance, assume you provide in your will that your IRA assets should go to your daughter. She will eventually receive the assets. However, she will not be treated as the beneficiary of your IRA, and therefore she will not be able to take advantage of the life expectancy options that would have been available to her had she been the direct designated beneficiary of the IRA. Instead, the IRA will be treated as having no designated beneficiary or a nonperson as the beneficiary.
Amounts Instead of Percentages
Some individuals like to ensure that a designated beneficiary will receive a specific amount. Toward this end, beneficiary designations may be formulated something like “$80,000 to Charlie and the remainder to John.” This designation may not be an issue for accounts that at the time of the IRA owner’s death have balances significantly higher than the stated amount, but it could be problematic for other accounts.
For instance, assume that the IRA balance left to Charlie and John was $100,000 when the beneficiary designation was completed. However, due to a loss on investments and distributions made to meet the RMD requirement, the balance at the time of the IRA owner’s death is less than $80,000. It may seem that the only option is to give Charlie the remaining balance, but if the IRA owner wanted John to receive some of the assets, the desired results would not be achieved.
A more effective beneficiary designation would have been one that awarded each beneficiary a percentage of the assets or included alternate provisions should the balance fall below a stated amount.
The Bottom Line
Before you submit your beneficiary designation, check with your financial advisor, custodian, or attorney to determine whether it will produce the results that you desire. If you have already submitted your beneficiary designation, you can still check its status. You should not assume that your IRA custodian will notify you if the designation is ambiguous or does not meet requirements.
In most cases, the problem is noticed only after the account owner is deceased and the beneficiary is ready to claim the assets. By seeing that your beneficiary designation is in good order, you help to ensure that your beneficiary will be able to access the assets at any time.