As a business technique, vertical integration first emerged in the 19th century. It was a term coined by Andrew Carnegie to describe the structure of his company, U.S. Steel. He had purchased almost every aspect of the supply and distribution chain his company relied on. The primary reason for this was to ensure consistent delivery of materials and distribution and an overall lower cost of doing business. These motives remain attractive to companies embarking on vertical integration today, and one of the primary reasons a company will vertically integrate with a supplier is to manage transaction costs.

Balance of Power Between Buyer and Seller

Microeconomists have noted that simple supply and demand market forces are not the sole factor influencing transaction prices. Just as important as market forces is the balance of power between buyers and sellers. This balance of power is constantly in flux, leading to unpredictability in pricing. This is particularly the case when there is a high volume of transactions between two companies. These frequent transactions provide more opportunity for negotiation and exploitation. If one company is exploiting the other and raising transaction costs as a result, vertical integration could eliminate the problem and reduce transaction costs. With both companies acting as a single entity, the prices will be set at an agreed-upon, non-negotiable rate.

Effect of Having One Buyer, One Seller

Another instance where the balance of power between buyer and seller may have a considerable impact on transaction costs is one in which there are only one buyer and one seller in a particular market. In such a case, the companies are mutually dependent, which may lead to excessive negotiation and therefore to higher transaction costs. Again, vertical integration would reduce this unpredictability and lower transaction costs. This is often the case with automotive companies, which are particularly prone to vertical integration with suppliers.

Alternatives to Vertical Integration

Despite the benefits of vertical integration, some buyers and sellers choose instead to form close-knit relationships and devise long-term contracts. This strategy, especially popular in Japan, eliminates uncertainty in transaction costs and avoids the problems associated with vertical integration. However, some companies still view vertical integration as a better option because vague wording or gaps in stipulations within a contract can lead to the exploitation of one party. This is particularly common in fast-moving industries such as technology. In such instances, vertical integration may be the only certain method of ensuring consistent and low transaction costs.

Vertical integration is a way of ensuring reduced transaction costs, but this choice may also result in other financial costs. For example, managerial costs will inevitably rise as a company becomes more complicated. Therefore, it is important to weigh the reduction of transaction costs against other financial implications before choosing the option of vertical integration. (For related reading, see "When Is Outsourcing Preferable to Vertical Integration?")

  1. Can Internet companies be vertically integrated?

    Find out how online businesses are beginning to take advantage of vertical integration for many of the same reasons as traditional ... Read Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between horizontal integration and vertical integration?

    Horizontal integration refers to acquiring a company in the same industry; vertical integration refers to a company acquisition ... Read Answer >>
  3. What are the most famous instances of backward integration?

    Learn more about backward integration in the supply chain and see how two famous examples, Carnegie Steel and Apple, used ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Small Business

    Vertical Integration

    Vertical integration occurs when a company buys and controls other businesses along its supply chain.
  2. Insights

    Cable Veteran Leo Hindery Jr. Casts Doubt on AT&T/Time Warner Merger (T, TWX)

    The former CEO of TCI and Liberty Media joins a growing group of skeptics who warn regulatory hurdles will doom the merger between AT&T and Time Warner.
  3. Investing

    The Ins And Outs of Seller-Financed Real Estate Deals

    There's more than one way to buy or sell a house. Seller financing presents yet another unique option.
  4. Insights

    A Year Later, Microsoft's Nokia Acquisition Makes Sense

    On the surface, Microsoft acquiring Nokia may mean very little to industry leaders such as Apple and Samsung. However decreased transaction and unit costs combined with a larger global distribution ...
  5. Trading

    Vertical Bull and Bear Credit Spreads

    This trading strategy is an excellent limited-risk strategy that can be widely used.
  6. Trading

    4 Popular Options Strategies for 2016

    Learn how long straddles, long strangles and vertical debit spreads can help you profit from the volatility that stock analysts expect for 2016.
  7. Investing

    The Pros and Cons of Owner Financing

    Details on the upside and risks of this type of deal for both the owner and the buyer.
  8. Tech

    Why Do A High Percentage Of Crypto Transactions Have No Economic Value?

    A high percentage of cryptocurrency transactions have no economic value, according to recent research.
  1. Vertical Well

    A vertical well is a well that is not turned horizontally at ...
  2. Forward Integration

    Forward integration is a business strategy that involves a form ...
  3. Vertical Analysis

    Vertical analysis is a method of financial statement analysis in ...
  4. Horizontal Market

    A horizontal market is diversified so that the products created ...
  5. Economic Integration

    Economic integration is an arrangement between different regions ...
  6. Third-Party Transaction

    A third-party transaction is a business deal with a buyer, a ...
Trading Center