Frictional and structural unemployment are two different types of unemployment that occur in an economy. Frictional unemployment is not a direct result of economic factors and occurs when workers search for jobs. Conversely, structural unemployment is caused by shifts in the economy that make it difficult for workers to find employment.
- Frictional unemployment involves people transitioning between jobs; it has nothing to do with the economic cycle and is voluntary.
- Structural unemployment is a direct result of shifts in the economy, including changes in technology or declines in an industry.
- Frictional unemployment is typically a temporary phenomenon, while structural unemployment can last for years.
- Structural unemployment is very concerning to economists, while frictional unemployment is considered inevitable and given less weight the unemployment rate.
Frictional unemployment is the result of workers searching for new employment or transitioning from their old jobs to new ones. It can also be referred to as “natural unemployment,” because it is not directly related to factors that lead to an underperforming economy.
Frictional unemployment is voluntary and a direct result of temporary transitions in employment. This includes new people who are entering the workforce, anyone who moves to find work in a different city, and people who quit their jobs to find other work. Workers may also choose to remain unemployed rather than take the first job they are offered. Thus, frictional unemployment is usually present in an economic system, because some people are always searching for new jobs.
Recent college graduates who are looking for work may not expect to find a job within a year of graduating due to their lack of experience. However, offers may come in for jobs that are not in their chosen field. When they reject those offers for that reason, they are frictionally unemployed. Employers can also cause frictional unemployment. For instance, employers may feel as though there are not enough qualified candidates for certain positions and thus not try to fill them.
Many economists remain unconcerned about frictional unemployment, as there is no way to stop it from happening. They realize that frictional unemployment is temporary and does not put a strain on government resources such as social assistance and unemployment benefits. It is actually a good sign for the economy, as it demonstrates that people are looking for higher-paying, better-quality jobs. Because frictional unemployment is generally accepted as a sign of a dynamic economy economists are less concerned about that component of the unemployment rate as opposed to structural or cyclical unemployment.
Cyclical unemployment is a result of the business cycle, with unemployment rising during recessions and declining with economic growth.
Structural unemployment is a type of long-term unemployment caused by shifts in the economy. It occurs when there is an oversupply of jobs and people who are willing to work them, but those people are not qualified to do so.
One of the reasons behind structural unemployment is technological advances, which can cause some types of skilled laborers to become obsolete. Assume a data analyst at an investment bank has been working in the field for more than 20 years but has never kept up with technological advances and never learned to program. The analyst’s job is easily programmable, and those programs can analyze big data faster. As the worker is not qualified for other data-analyst jobs, which require extensive programming skills, they would experience structural unemployment.
Structural unemployment can also be caused by a decline in an industry. Assume the prices of crude oil have been on the decline over the past year. Therefore, shale oil drilling companies have also been on the decline, losing money on their total investments due to the weakened oil industry. To combat operating at a loss, the shale oil drilling companies must lay off many of their workers. The skilled workers in the drilling field do not have the skills to perform other jobs in emerging industries and markets. Consequently, the decline in this industry can lead to structural unemployment.
Because structural unemployment is a direct result of the economic cycle, economists and analysts take it very seriously. If not addressed, this type of unemployment can last for years, even decades, increasing a nation’s unemployment rate.