A:

Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama signed into law several major legislative responses to the financial crisis of 2008. The most influential and controversial of these was the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which introduced a raft of measures designed to regulate the activities of the financial sector and protect consumers.

Other notable laws include the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, which created the Troubled Asset Relief Program; the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act; and the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act (HEARTH). All of these laws are separate from the unprecedented actions taken by the Federal Reserve, which were not governed by any particular legislation.

Dodd-Frank 

Dodd-Frank was signed into law in July 2010 and brought sweeping reforms to the U.S. financial sector. One of its provisions, the Volcker Rule, was designed to limit speculative investments. The law created the "Sifi" (systemically important financial institution) designation for banks and non-banks, which places additional regulatory burdens on institutions considered "too big to fail." It attempted to increase market transparency by mandating clearing for certain derivatives. It gave the Federal Reserve oversight powers and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to curtail practices that take advantage of consumers. 

Supporters have defended these measures, arguing that the law had an overall positive effect on the financial sector and made another crisis less likely. Critics have found a number of faults with the law, the complexity of which has given rise to unintended consequences. The Volcker Rule, for example, has acted as a de facto ban on proprietary trading by depository institutions, decreasing profits and arguably making the banking system more fragile, even as it has decreased the risk that speculative investments will blow up. Increased compliance costs have weighed on smaller banks, handing the big banks an advantage and perhaps exacerbating the "too big to fail" problem. 

According to a 2014 assessment of Dodd-Frank's impact by the Brookings Institution, the law achieved a "clear win" by increasing the levels of capital that banks keep on hand, leading to greater stability for the system as a whole. Another success, according to Brookings, was the creation of the CFPB. Restrictions on the Fed's emergency lending abilities, on the other hand, were a "clear loss," while the Volcker Rule and other provisions represented "costly trade-offs."

As of October 2017, Republicans control both chambers of Congress and the White House and are pursuing a rollback of major Dodd-Frank provisions, through both Congress and the executive branch. A Treasury report issued in October identified regulations that could be scrapped to encourage growth, and in June the House passed the Financial Choice Act, which would repeal the Volcker Rule and the Sifi designation.

Emergency Economic Stabilization Act

On Oct 3, 2008, a divided Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, which provided the Treasury with approximately $700 billion to purchase "troubled assets," mostly bank shares and mortgage-backed securities. The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), as the program was known, ultimately spent $426.4 billion bailing out institutions including American International Group Inc. (AIG), Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and General Motors Co. (GM). The Treasury recovered $441.7 billion from TARP recipients.

The program was extremely controversial. For some critics, the temporary nationalization of banks and carmakers amounted to socializing key portions of the economy. For others the bailout recipients' largesse – Washington Mutual CEO Alan Fishman was paid $20 million in 17 days on the job, after which the company was taken over by the federal government – contrasted shamefully with the lack of support for families who lost their homes.

RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the purpose of the Volcker Rule?

    Learn about how the Volcker rule prohibits banks from engaging in certain activities, such as proprietary trading and having ... Read Answer >>
  2. What impact does government regulation have on the financial services sector?

    Learn about how the financial services industry is affected by government regulation, and the different types of regulations ... Read Answer >>
  3. What are some of the major regulatory agencies responsible for overseeing financial ...

    Discover the specific responsibilities of some of the major regulatory agencies that oversee financial institutions in the ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Insights

    Bank Stocks: The Attack on Dodd-Frank

    Bank stocks were given an initial boost after the House passed the new bill to repeal Dodd-Frank.
  2. Insights

    Fintech in the Trump Era: Regulatory Changes to Expect

    Will Trump’s administration try to repeal Dodd-Frank, or simply change financial regulations?
  3. Personal Finance

    Volcker Rule Under Threat by Trump Presidency

    The Volcker Rule is likely to be threatened by the new administration appointed by Donald Trump, who campaigned on promises to dismantle Dodd-Frank.
  4. Insights

    How New Bank Rules Will Buoy Bank Stocks

    A new bill proposing to repeal aspects of Dodd-Frank would provide a lift to bank earnings.
  5. Insights

    War Over "Too Big to Fail" Continues (RIF, CIT)

    Under new legislation, banks will no longer be designated as "too big to fail" just because they control assets of $50 billion or more.
  6. Insights

    Financial Regulations: Glass-Steagall to Dodd-Frank

    Here are some of the most important financial regulations that have been established.
  7. Investing

    How Do Financial Regulations Affect Smaller Banks?

    Not to big to fail? We explain how US financial regulations affect smaller banks.
  8. Insights

    Dodd-Frank: Republicans' New Plan to Replace It

    Republican leaders are working to replace Dodd-Frank.
  9. Investing

    Trump's Bank Deregulation May Send Investors $120B

    Trump's plan to dismantle Dodd-Frank may free $120 billion in capital to pass on to investors
RELATED TERMS
  1. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ...
  2. Troubled Asset Relief Program - TARP

    The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was a group of programs ...
  3. Systemically Important Financial Institution – SIFI

    Systemically important financial institution (SIFI) is a firm ...
  4. Crapo Bill

    The Crapo Bill is the nickname for the Economic Growth, Regulatory ...
  5. Emergency Banking Act Of 1933

    A bill passed during the administration of former U.S. President ...
  6. Securities Act Of 1933

    The Securities Act Of 1933 is a federal piece of legislation ...
Hot Definitions
  1. Price-Earnings Ratio - P/E Ratio

    The Price-to-Earnings Ratio or P/E ratio is a ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative ...
  2. Internal Rate of Return - IRR

    Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is a metric used in capital budgeting to estimate the profitability of potential investments.
  3. Limit Order

    An order placed with a brokerage to buy or sell a set number of shares at a specified price or better.
  4. Current Ratio

    The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to pay short-term and long-term obligations.
  5. Return on Investment (ROI)

    Return on Investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or compare the efficiency ...
  6. Interest Coverage Ratio

    The interest coverage ratio is a debt ratio and profitability ratio used to determine how easily a company can pay interest ...
Trading Center