Table of Contents
Table of Contents

Comparing a Dominant Strategy Solution vs. Nash Equilibrium Solution

Dominant Strategy Solution vs. Nash Equilibrium Solution: An Overview

Game theory is the science of strategic decision-making in situations that involve more than one actor. These can include actual games or real-life situations like military battles, business interactions, or managerial decisions. According to game theory, the best strategy for an individual may or may not be the same depending on the stakes of the game and given the likely move of the other player involved.

Sometimes, the best strategy will be the same no matter how other players act. This is known as the dominant strategy. On the other hand, there exists the so-called Nash equilibrium, which does not describe a particular strategy per se, but rather a sort of mutual understanding—each player understands the other player's optimal strategies and considers those when optimizing their own strategy.

Key Takeaways

  • According to game theory, the dominant strategy is the optimal move for an individual regardless of how other players act.
  • A Nash equilibrium describes the optimal state of the game where both players make optimal moves but now consider the moves of their opponent.
  • A well-known example of where the Nash equilibrium plays out in game theory is the prisoner's dilemma.
  • Although independent concepts, the dominant strategy could also be the Nash equilibrium.
  • Nash equilibrium can occur when a group fully cooperates or when no members of a group cooperate.

Dominant Strategy Solution

A dominant strategy solution may also be in Nash equilibrium, although the underlying principles of a dominant strategy render Nash analysis somewhat superfluous. In other words, the cost and benefit incentives don't change based on other actors.

In the dominant strategy, each player's best strategy is unaffected by the actions of other players. This renders the critical assumption of the Nash equilibrium—that each actor knows the optimal strategy of the other players—possible but almost pointless.

Game theory is the science of strategy in situations that involve more than one actor. This can include actual games, military battles, business interactions, or managerial economics.

Nash Equilibrium Solution

The Nash equilibrium is named after John Forbes Nash, Jr., who authored a one-page article in 1950 (and a longer follow-up in 1951) describing a stable-state equilibrium in a multi-person situation where no participant gains by a change in his strategy as long as the other participants also remain unchanged.

In other words, a Nash equilibrium takes place when each player remains in the same position as long as no other player would take a different action. Each player would be worse off and, therefore, chooses not to move.

John Nash's life and discovery of his equilibrium state were documented in the 2001 Hollywood film, A Beautiful Mind.

The most famous example of Nash equilibrium is the prisoner's dilemma. In the prisoner's dilemma, two criminals are captured and interrogated separately. Even though each would be best off by not cooperating with police, each expects the other criminal to confess and reach a plea deal. Thus, there is a conflict between group rationality and individual rationality, and each criminal is likely to rat out the other.

This example has caused some confusion about the Nash equilibrium. The theory is not used exclusively for situations where there is a defecting party; the Nash equilibrium can exist where all members of a group cooperate or where none do. In fact, many games can have multiple Nash equilibria.

Nash Equilibrium vs Dominant Strategy FAQs 

Is the Dominant Strategy the Same As the Nash Equilibrium?

With dominant strategy, each player is unaware of the other's optimal strategy. Each player chooses the best strategy among all options. Nash equilibrium occurs when each player knows the strategy of their opponent and uses that knowledge to form their own strategy. The dominant strategy may be the Nash equilibrium, however.

Why Is an Equilibrium Stable in Dominant Strategies?

The dominant strategy is the best strategy chosen by players. When both parties have dominant strategies, equilibrium is stable as neither party has a motive to change.

How Do You Find the Dominant Strategy and Nash Equilibrium?

Nash equilibrium takes place when players don't change their positions, knowing that a change in positions would create a worse outcome. Dominant strategy occurs when each player chooses the best strategy, independent of the opponent's move.

What Is the Solution in Dominant Strategies?

The solution in dominant strategies is when both players have chosen the best strategy and those choices are unaffected or not influenced by the choice of the opposing party.

Article Sources

Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Annals of Mathematics. "Non-Cooperative Games." Accessed April 24, 2020.

  2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "Equilibrium Points in n-Person Games." Accessed April 23, 2020.

  3. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. "Prisoner's Dilemma." Accessed April 23, 2020.

Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.