A:

The broken window fallacy was first expressed by the great French economist, Frederic Bastiat. Bastiat used the parable of a broken window to point out why destruction doesn't benefit the economy.

In Bastiat's tale, a man's son breaks a pane of glass, meaning the man will have to pay to replace it. The onlookers consider the situation and decide that the boy has actually done the community a service because his father will have to pay the glazier (window repair man) to replace the broken pane. The glazier will then presumably spend the extra money on something else, jump-starting the local economy. (For related reading, see Economics Basics.)

The onlookers come to believe that breaking windows stimulates the economy, but Bastiat points out that further analysis exposes the fallacy. By breaking the window, the man's son has reduced his father's disposable income, meaning his father will not be able purchase new shoes or some other luxury good. Thus, the broken window might help the glazier, but at the same time, it robs other industries and reduces the amount being spent on other goods. Moreover, replacing something that has already been purchased is a maintenance cost, rather than a purchase of truly new goods, and maintenance doesn't stimulate production. In short, Bastiat suggests that destruction - and its costs - don't pay in an economic sense.

The broken window fallacy is often used to discredit the idea that going to war stimulates a country's economy. As with the broken window, war causes resources and capital to be funneled out of industries that produce goods to industries that destroy things, leading to even more costs. According to this line of reasoning, the rebuilding that occurs after war is primarily maintenance costs, meaning that countries would be much better off not fighting at all.

The broken window fallacy also demonstrates the faulty conclusions of the onlookers; by only taking into consideration the man with the broken window and the glazier who must replace it, the crowd forgets about the missing third party (such as the shoe maker). In this sense, the fallacy comes from making a decision by looking only at the parties directly involved in the short term, rather than looking at all parties (directly and indirectly) involved in the short and long term.

For related reading, see Macroeconomic Analysis.

RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the candle maker's petition?

    The "Candle Maker's Petition" is a satire of protectionist tariffs written the by great French economist, Frederic Bastiat. ... Read Answer >>
  2. Why is a bank guarantee important in a long-term project contract?

    Understand what a bank guarantee is and learn why it is so important to the risk and safety of a long-term project contract Read Answer >>
  3. Does homeowners insurance cover broken pipes?

    Learn how a typical home insurance policy excludes coverage for the broken pipe itself but covers the resulting accidental ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Investing

    Microsoft: Windows 10 Upgrade Prompts Class Action

    Microsoft hit with a class action lawsuit—upgrades allegedly resulted in lost data, damage to PCs.
  2. Insights

    MSFT to Start Charging Users for Windows Upgrade (MSFT, AAPL)

    Microsoft will start charging for Windows 10 upgrades in July.
  3. Investing

    Microsoft Confirms Update Is Coming To Windows 10

    Microsoft confirmed at its developer conference that an update is coming to Windows 10 this year.
  4. Insights

    Microsoft Backs Away From Windows 10 Goal (MSFT)

    Microsoft backs off from its goal of reaching 1 billion devices to run on Windows 10 by the middle of 2018
  5. Investing

    Microsoft Shutting Google Chrome Out Of Latest Windows Version

    Microsoft's new Windows 10 S operating system geared toward the education market is shutting out Google's Chrome Internet browser.
  6. Investing

    Microsoft Blocks Latest Windows 10 Update

    Microsoft is running into trouble with the latest version, prompted MSFT to block its own update.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Lump of Labor Fallacy

    The lump of labor fallacy is the assumption that the quantity ...
  2. Window Settlement

    A form of settlement between dealers whereby trades are settled ...
  3. Bag Holder

    Bag holder is an informal investment term used to describe an ...
  4. Direct Cost

    A price that can be completely attributed to the production of ...
  5. Memory-Of-Price Strategy

    A trading strategy that assumes the support and resistance points ...
  6. Capital Improvement

    A capital improvement is a permanent structural change or restoration ...
Hot Definitions
  1. Internal Rate of Return - IRR

    Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is a metric used in capital budgeting to estimate the profitability of potential investments.
  2. Limit Order

    An order placed with a brokerage to buy or sell a set number of shares at a specified price or better.
  3. Current Ratio

    The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to pay short-term and long-term obligations.
  4. Return on Investment (ROI)

    Return on Investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or compare the efficiency ...
  5. Interest Coverage Ratio

    The interest coverage ratio is a debt ratio and profitability ratio used to determine how easily a company can pay interest ...
  6. Cash Conversion Cycle - CCC

    Cash conversion cycle (CCC) is a metric that expresses the length of time, in days, that it takes for a company to convert ...
Trading Center