The broken window fallacy was first expressed by the great French economist, Frederic Bastiat. Bastiat used the parable of a broken window to point out why destruction doesn't benefit the economy.

In Bastiat's tale, a man's son breaks a pane of glass, meaning the man will have to pay to replace it. The onlookers consider the situation and decide that the boy has actually done the community a service because his father will have to pay the glazier (window repair man) to replace the broken pane. The glazier will then presumably spend the extra money on something else, jump-starting the local economy. (For related reading, see Economics Basics.)

The onlookers come to believe that breaking windows stimulates the economy, but Bastiat points out that further analysis exposes the fallacy. By breaking the window, the man's son has reduced his father's disposable income, meaning his father will not be able purchase new shoes or some other luxury good. Thus, the broken window might help the glazier, but at the same time, it robs other industries and reduces the amount being spent on other goods. Moreover, replacing something that has already been purchased is a maintenance cost, rather than a purchase of truly new goods, and maintenance doesn't stimulate production. In short, Bastiat suggests that destruction - and its costs - don't pay in an economic sense.

The broken window fallacy is often used to discredit the idea that going to war stimulates a country's economy. As with the broken window, war causes resources and capital to be funneled out of industries that produce goods to industries that destroy things, leading to even more costs. According to this line of reasoning, the rebuilding that occurs after war is primarily maintenance costs, meaning that countries would be much better off not fighting at all.

The broken window fallacy also demonstrates the faulty conclusions of the onlookers; by only taking into consideration the man with the broken window and the glazier who must replace it, the crowd forgets about the missing third party (such as the shoe maker). In this sense, the fallacy comes from making a decision by looking only at the parties directly involved in the short term, rather than looking at all parties (directly and indirectly) involved in the short and long term.

For related reading, see Macroeconomic Analysis.

  1. What are common examples of bad decisions made due to the sunk cost fallacy?

    Learn more about the ways some businesses reject proper analysis in favor of the sunk cost fallacy, and discover ways to ... Read Answer >>
  2. How can you avoid the sunk cost trap?

    Read out how the sunk cost trap works, an example of how it affects decision-making and how to avoid it when making economic ... Read Answer >>
Related Articles
  1. Investing

    Microsoft Windows 10 for Workstations Leaked

    A new version of Windows 10 that appears targeted at high-power computers has accidentally leaked.
  2. Investing

    Microsoft Confirms Update Is Coming To Windows 10

    Microsoft confirmed at its developer conference that an update is coming to Windows 10 this year.
  3. Tech

    Microsoft Willing to Pay Up to $250,000 for Windows Security Bugs

    Every part of Windows is now covered by the company’s bug bounty scheme.
  4. Insights

    Microsoft Backs Away From Windows 10 Goal (MSFT)

    Microsoft backs off from its goal of reaching 1 billion devices to run on Windows 10 by the middle of 2018
  5. Investing

    3 High-Pressure Home Improvement Sales Tactics

    Vendors selling products related to the improvement of your home can be some of the most challenging salespeople to deal with.
  6. Investing

    Android Is Within Striking Distance of Windows

    Microsoft's Windows dominance in overall Internet usage is being eroded by Google's Android OS.
  7. Investing

    Microsoft Completes Windows 10 Version for China

    Microsoft created a version of Windows 10 for China that meets its tougher security standards.
  1. Frederic Bastiat

    A 19th-century philosopher and economist famous for his ideas ...
  2. Window Guaranteed Investment Contract

    A type of investment plan where a series of payments are made ...
  3. Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy

    An analysis of outcomes out of context that can give the illusion ...
  4. Gambler's Fallacy/Monte Carlo Fallacy

    The Gambler's Fallacy occurs with the erroneous belief that the ...
  5. Window Dressing

    A strategy used by mutual fund and portfolio managers near the ...
  6. Window Settlement

    A form of settlement between dealers whereby trades are settled ...
Hot Definitions
  1. Diversification

    Diversification is the strategy of investing in a variety of securities in order to lower the risk involved with putting ...
  2. Liquidity

    Liquidity is the degree to which an asset or security can be quickly bought or sold in the market without affecting the asset's ...
  3. Federal Funds Rate

    The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which a depository institution lends funds maintained at the Federal Reserve ...
  4. Call Option

    An agreement that gives an investor the right (but not the obligation) to buy a stock, bond, commodity, or other instrument ...
  5. Standard Deviation

    A measure of the dispersion of a set of data from its mean, calculated as the square root of the variance. The more spread ...
  6. Entrepreneur

    An entrepreneur is an individual who founds and runs a small business and assumes all the risk and reward of the venture.
Trading Center