Systemic Risk vs. Systematic Risk: What's the Difference?

Systemic Risk vs. Systematic Risk: An Overview

Systemic risk describes an event that can spark a major collapse in a specific industry or the broader economy. Systematic risk is the pervasive, far-reaching, perpetual market risk that reflects a variety of troubling factors.

Systemic risk is often a complete, exogenous shock to the system, such as the threat that one of the major banks that collapsed during the 2008 financial crisis could then trigger a massive market implosion.

Systematic risk is the overall, day-to-day, ongoing risk that can be caused by a combination of factors, including the economy, interest rates, geopolitical issues, corporate health, and other factors.

Key Takeaways

  • Systemic risk and systematic risk are both dangers to the financial markets and economy, but the cause of these risks–and the methods for managing them–is different.
  • Systemic risk is the risk that a company- or industry-level risk could trigger a huge collapse.
  • Systematic risk is the risk inherent to the entire market, attributable to a mix of factors including economic, socio-political, and market-related events.

Systemic risk is harder to quantify and harder to predict, whereas a systematic risk is more quantifiable and can be anticipated (in some cases).

Systemic Risk

Systemic risk represents the risk connected to the complete failure of a business, a sector, an industry, a financial institution, or the overall economy. It can also be used to describe small, specific problems, such as the security flaws for a bank account or website user information. Bigger, wider-reaching issues include a broad economic crisis sparked by a collapse in the financial system.

The word systemic, itself, is mainly used to describe a specific health-related issue that affects a person's entire body. This description has then been borrowed to explain the way smaller financial issues can dangerously impact the economy or financial system.

Systematic Risk

While systemic risk is a bit amorphous, systematic risk has a more common meaning. The term is often used interchangeably with "market risk" and means the danger that is baked into the overall market that can't be resolved by diversifying your portfolio or holdings. Broad market risk can be caused by recessions, periods of economic weakness, wars, rising or stagnating interest rates, fluctuations in currencies or commodity prices, among other big-picture issues. While systematic risk can't be knocked out with a different asset allocation strategy, it can be managed.

The market risk that is firm or industry-specific and is fixable is called unsystematic or idiosyncratic risk. With systematic risk, diversification won't help. This is because the risks are much broader than one sector or company. The word systematic implies a planned, step-by-step approach to a problem or issue.

Investors hoping to mitigate the risks of systematic risk can make sure that their portfolios include a variety of asset classes–such as equities, fixed income, cash, and real estate–because each of these will react differently to a major systemic change.

Systemic Risk vs. Systematic Risk Example

The collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in 2008 is an example of systemic risk. After the global financial services firm filed for bankruptcy, shockwaves were felt throughout the entire financial system and the economy. Because Lehman Brothers was a large company and deeply ingrained within the economy, its collapse resulted in a domino effect that generated a major risk to the global financial system.

The Great Recession of the late 2000s is an example of systematic risk. Anyone who was invested in the market in 2008 saw the values of their investments change drastically from this economic event. This recession affected asset classes in different ways: riskier securities were sold off in large quantities, while simpler assets, such as U.S. Treasury securities, increased their value.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. “Lessons from the failure of Lehman Brothers.”

  2. Federal Reserve History. “The Great Recession.”

Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.