Federal banking regulators told lawmakers for a second day that the industry needs stricter rules, such as forcing them to hold long-term debt, to guard against a repeat of this month's chaos.
“We need to move forward with our work to improve the resilience of the banking system,” Michael Barr, vice chair for supervision of the Federal Reserve, told the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday. Mirroring comments day earlier to senators, Barr also suggested better stress-testing, changes to liquidity rules and implementation of the previously announced Basel III “endgame” reforms.
Republican lawmakers pushed back, saying more regulation would be costly and unneeded, and blaming the crisis on lax Fed regulators who failed to enforce existing rules on Silicon Valley Bank.
This week's testimony sets the stage for a debate in Congress over what, if anything, to change to prevent banks from unravelling so suddenly that the government was forced into a drastic response to backstop the banking system. The Fed is set to release a report on Silicon Valley Bank's failure and provide more detailed proposals on May 1.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Martin Gruenberg told senators on Tuesday that regulation of banks that have more than $100 million of assets deserves “serious attention,” especially when it comes to capital requirements, liquidity and interest rate risk. He said the FDIC was reviewing the deposit insurance system and would submit a report on May 1.
While the FDIC insures deposits of more than $250,000, shortcomings came to light in SVB's failure, where more than 90% of depositors had banked more than that.
Republicans kept up their criticism on Wednesday.
“These reforms will result in additional costs on consumers, on businesses, and investors,” said Missouri Congresswoman Ann Wagner. “Examiners and your supervisors were asleep at the wheel."