Has High Frequency Trading Ruined the Stock Market for the Rest of Us?

If you are an investor, high-frequency trading (HFT) is a part of your life even if you don't know it. You've likely purchased shares offered by a computer, or sold shares that were purchased and instantly sold by another computer. HFT is controversial. Traders disagree and studies contradict other studies. Regardless of the opinions, what is most important is how HFT affects your money.

Key Takeaways

  • High-frequency trading is blamed for the flash crash that occurred on May 6, 2010, when the major indices plummeted in a matter of minutes.
  • At least one study suggests that HFT firms make higher profits when trading against retail investors in the futures market.
  • Despite fears over high-frequency trading, annual revenue at HFT firms has declined significantly since 2011.

What Is High-Frequency Trading (HFT)?

High-frequency trading (HFT) is a broader term for various trading strategies that involve buying and selling financial securities at extremely high speeds. Using algorithmic trading, computers can identify market patterns and utilize automated and pre-programmed instructions to execute buy and sell orders in a matter of milliseconds.

One strategy is to serve as a market maker, where the HFT firm provides liquidity on both the buy and sell sides. By purchasing at the bid price and selling at the ask price, high-frequency traders can make profits of a penny or less per share. This translates to big profits when multiplied over millions of shares.

Does High-Frequency Trading Hurt the Market?

Because most trading leaves a computerized paper trail, one would think it would be easy to look at the practices of high-frequency traders and answer this question. However, HFT companies are reluctant to divulge their trading activities, and the large amount of data involved makes it difficult to form a cohesive picture.

Critics of high-frequency trading point to the flash crash that occurred on May 6, 2010. The major indices mysteriously plummeted 5-6% in minutes, and just as inexplicably, quickly rebounded. Shares of individual companies were executed at prices more than 60% off their value just moments before. Some trades executed for a penny or $100,000stub quote prices that were never intended to be filled.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a report blaming one very large trade in the S&P e-mini futures contract, which set off a cascading effect among high-frequency traders. As one algorithm sold rapidly, it triggered another, creating a financial snowball.

Following the flash crash, the SEC developed new circuit breaker rules that would impose a trading pause when a stock moves up or down by 10% or more within a five-minute period. Many critics asked whether imposing tighter regulations on high-frequency traders made sense, especially since smaller, less visible flash crashes happen throughout the market with regularity.

Does High-Frequency Trading Hurt Retail Investors?

What is important to most of the investing public is how high-frequency trading affects the retail investor. This is the person whose retirement savings are in the market, or the person who invests in the market in order to gain better returns than the near non-existent interest that comes from a savings account. A 2014 study shed some light on this question.

Former economists for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) studied HFT firms over a two-year period and found that revenue was concentrated among a handful of companies in a winner-takes-all market structure.

Studying the S&P 500 e-mini contracts, the researchers found that high-frequency traders made an average profit of $1.92 for every contract traded with large institutional investors and an average of $3.49 when they traded with retail investors. The paper concluded that these profits were at the expense of other traders and this may cause traders to leave the futures market.

The Bottom Line

Unchecked, the proliferation of high-frequency trading could risk creating the perception that the small investor cannot win. Governments have sought to rein in HFT firms, for example, by proposing a per-share trading tax. In 2012, Canada raised fees on market messages such as trades, order submissions, and cancellations, which disproportionately hit HFT firms because they send more messages than other traders.

Despite fears over high-frequency trading, there is also evidence to suggest that HFT firms simply don't pose the threat they once did. Revenue and profits have dwindled, making it tougher for HFT firms to survive. Industrywide, annual revenue is estimated at $6.1 billion in 2021, down considerably from more than $22 billion in 2011.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010," Pages 1-3.

  2. Matthew Baron, Jonathan Brogaard, and Andrei Kirilenko. "Risk and Return in High Frequency Trading," Pages 3, 30.

  3. IBIS World. "High Frequency Trading in the US—Market Size 2003-2026."

  4. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Investor Bulletin: New Stock-by-Stock Circuit Breakers."

  5. Congressional Research Service. "High-Frequency Trading: Background, Concerns, and Regulatory Developments," Pages 24-25.

Compare to Similar Robo Advisors
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.