Index Mutual Funds Vs. Index ETFs

Investment can be either active or passive. With the active approach, the investor purchases, holds and sells securities and makes decisions based on fundamental research of a company or industry, in particular, and of the national and global economy in general. By contrast, the passive investment approach entails replicating a benchmark or index of securities that share common traits.

Key Takeaways

  • Index investing is an increasingly popular way to passively invest in the market, but which is better: an index mutual fund or ETF?
  • ETFs tend to be more liquid, have lower net fees, and are more tax efficient than equivalent mutual funds.
  • For those seeking a more active approach to indexing, such as smart-beta, a mutual fund may provide more expert professional management.

Active vs. Passive

Active investors believe they can beat the market and earn alpha. Passive investors maintain that market inefficiencies over the long term get ironed out ("arbitraged away," in the parlance of market professionals), so attempting to beat the market is fruitless. Passive investors simply desire to achieve beta or the market return.

For the typical individual investor, passive investment is best accomplished through two choices: an open-end investment company, otherwise known as a mutual fund, or an exchange-traded fund (ETF). Because both types of funds track an underlying index, differences in performance typically result from the tracking error, or degree to which the fund fails to replicate the index.

Additionally, the cost of an ETF can be lower than its mutual fund counterpart, a difference that can affect performance as well. Another important consideration that bears on performance is investor behavior. What follows is a basic discussion of the main attributes of each and under what circumstances one would use them.

The Truly Passive Investor 

This individual wants to achieve optimal asset allocation best suited to their objectives at a low cost and with minimal activity. For this investor, the index mutual fund would be preferable. A typical adjustment in exposure would be achieved through rebalancing on a regular basis to maintain consistency with their goal. Should circumstances change the adjustment of one's allocation, then tactical changes are easily accomplished.

A truly passive investor purchases an index and then "sets it and forgets it." Trades would only take place when the index's composition is changed as companies are added or dropped by the index provider.

The (At Times) Not So Passive Investor 

This individual shares many of the goals of the truly passive investor, but may exhibit greater sophistication and want to effect changes in their portfolio with greater speed and precision. For this type of investor, the ETF would be more appropriate. While taking the passive approach, like its older mutual fund cousin, the ETF allows the holder to take and implement a directional view on the market or markets in ways that the mutual fund cannot. For example, as with shares of common stock, ETFs trade in the secondary market. Investors may purchase and sell them during market hours, rather than be dependent upon forward pricing, where the traditional mutual fund's price is calculated at net asset value (NAV) after the market close.

Additionally, investors may short sell an ETF. The passive investor who may be opportunistically inclined will relish the greater flexibility that this vehicle affords. Tactical changes and market plays may be executed rapidly. The one potential disadvantage is the accumulation of trading costs as a function of one's trading activity. Using ETFs in the aforementioned way is an active application of a passive investment.

The investor should understand market dynamics as they affect asset class behavior and be able to understand and justify their decision-making process, not forgetting that trading costs can reduce investment returns. Investors should understand that attempting to practice the hedge fund strategy of global macro (taking directional bets on asset classes to achieve outsized returns) is akin to a marksman attempting to achieve the range and precision of a high-powered rifle with a .22 caliber gun.

Smart beta investing combines the benefits of passive investing and the advantages of active investing strategies. The goal of smart beta is to obtain alpha, lower risk or increase diversification at a cost lower than traditional active management and marginally higher than straight index investing. It seeks the best construction of an optimally diversified portfolio.

Additional Considerations

Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion, there are several other features of which individual investors should make note when deciding whether to use an index mutual fund or index ETF. Mutual funds have different share classes, sale charge arrangements and holding period requirements to discourage rapid trading. The investor's time frame and (dis)inclination to trade will dictate what product to use. ETFs are built for speed, all else being equal, as they carry no such arrangements.

Mutual funds also often have purchase minimums that can be high, depending on the account in which one invests. Not so with exchange-traded funds. There are tax consequences, however, to investing in either a mutual fund or an ETF. The mutual fund can cause the holder to incur capital gains taxes in two ways.

When they sell for an amount greater than the purchase price, the investor realizes a capital gain. On the other hand, an investor may hold a mutual fund and still incur capital gains taxes if other investors in the same fund sell en masse and force the fund to sell individual holdings to raise cash for redemptions. Those sales may cause the remaining fund holders to incur a capital gain.

Finally, mutual funds offer investors dividend reinvestment programs that enable automatic reinvestment of the fund's cash dividends. In a taxable brokerage account, the dividends would be taxed, even though they're reinvested. ETFs have no such feature. Cash from dividends is placed into the brokerage account of the investor who may well incur a commission to purchase additional shares of the ETF with the dividend that it paid out. Some brokers waive any sales charge. Because of commission costs, ETFs typically do not work in a salary deferral arrangement. However, in an IRA, no tax ramifications from trading would affect the investor.

The Bottom Line

When considering an index mutual fund versus the index ETF, the individual investor would do well to consult an experienced professional who works with individual investors of differing needs. No two individuals' circumstances are identical and the choice of one index product over another results from a confluence of circumstances. As with any investment decision, investors need to do their homework and due diligence.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. IRS. "Mutual Funds (Costs, Distributions, etc.)"

  2. IRS. "Topic No. 409 Capital Gains and Losses."

  3. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Mutual Funds and ETFs," Page 36.

  4. IRS. "Stocks (Options, Splits, Traders) 2."

Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.