When you’re in need of credit, it can be easy to fall victim to predatory lending scams. Whether demanding an exorbitant interest rate on a payday loan, taking your car title as collateral, or pushing a bigger mortgage than you can afford, there are many ways unscrupulous lenders try to take advantage of borrowers. Predatory lenders often target the most vulnerable, such as someone who has recently lost a job, has poor credit, or just doesn’t know what to watch out for. Black and Latinx communities, in particular, have long fallen prey to abusive lending practices.
Fortunately, there are laws aimed at protecting borrowers against loan sharks and other predatory lenders. These laws cap interest rates, ban discriminatory practices, and even outlaw some types of lending. While Congress has passed some federal credit laws, many states have taken the initiative to rein in predatory lending. With both the rules and credit products constantly evolving, it’s important to familiarize yourself with the latest regulations.
- Predatory lenders may use aggressive tactics and unfair loan terms—such as high interest rates and fees—to take advantage of unsuspecting borrowers.
- These lenders tend to go after the most vulnerable and least knowledgeable borrowers, often targeting Black and Latinx communities.
- A patchwork of laws has been put in place to protect borrowers, from setting limits on interest rates to banning discrimination and other unscrupulous practices.
Loan Shark Definition
Types of Predatory Loans and How They’re Regulated
Efforts to combat predatory lending have been going on almost as long as people have borrowed money, beginning centuries ago when various religions condemned the practice of usury, or charging unreasonably high interest rates. In the U.S., a patchwork of laws at the state and federal level have been crafted to protect borrowers, but they sometimes struggle to keep pace with evolving predatory practices. Here are some examples of predatory loans, as well as the specific laws and regulations relevant to each type of financing. Knowing the characteristics of these loans can help you recognize one if it's offered to you and avoid being caught. It's not always easy to tell.
Subprime Mortgages and Housing Discrimination
Subprime mortgages, which are offered to borrowers with weak or “subprime” credit ratings, aren’t always considered predatory. The higher interest rate is seen as compensation for subprime lenders, who are taking on more risk by lending to borrowers with a poor credit history. But some lenders have aggressively promoted subprime loans to homeowners who can’t afford them—or sometimes qualify for more favorable loan terms but don't realize it. Such unscrupulous tactics occurred at a mass scale in the lead-up to the subprime mortgage crisis in 2008, which resulted in the Great Recession.
The fallout from the financial crisis hit Black and Latinx homeowners the hardest. Many of the same neighborhoods that had for decades faced racial discrimination in getting access to mortgages, a practice known as redlining, became targets of so-called "reverse redlining" by predatory lenders charging high interest rates. Black and Latinx homeowners were more likely to be targeted by subprime lenders, one study found, even when taking into consideration factors such as credit scores and how much income goes toward housing and debt costs.
Discrimination remains a problem, according to another recent study, which found that racial gaps in mortgage costs have persisted over the past four decades. In turn, discriminatory mortgage practices have exacerbated the racial wealth gap, according to the Urban Institute, with Black homeowners having built up little more than a quarter of the housing wealth of White homeowners.
Housing laws that protect borrowers
Over the past six decades, significant progress has been made in protecting homeowners from abuse and discrimination, despite the persistence of predatory practices. In 1968, two new laws took different approaches to strengthening homeowners protections—and they continue to evolve. The Fair Housing Act (FHA) outlawed discrimination in real estate, including for mortgage borrowers. Initially banning discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, and sex, the law was later amended to cover disabilities and family status as well
The other key law passed in 1968, the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), required mortgage companies and other lenders to disclose the terms of their loans. The law was expanded several times to cover a range of real estate practices. In 1994, TILA was amended to include the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), which helped protect borrowers against predatory, high-cost mortgages.
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), another pillar of protection for borrowers, was enacted in 1974. While initially focused on banning credit discrimination against women, it has since been expanded to cover race, color, religion, national origin, age, or participation in public assistance programs
The ECOA and FHA were applied in some of the biggest enforcement actions against discriminatory practices that occurred during the 2008 crisis. Reaching settlements with penalties of $335 million from Countrywide Financial and $175 million from Wells Fargo, the Justice Department required the banks to compensate Black and Latinx borrowers who were improperly steered into subprime loans.
In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in response to the crisis, put the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in charge of oversight over ECOA and TILA. While some disclosure requirements under TILA were strengthened during the Obama administration, the Trump administration made changes that some consumer advocates worry could promote predatory lending. The CFPB, for example, finalized rules in December 2020 that made it easier for loans to be considered as “qualified mortgages,” which provides legal protections to lenders. However, under the Biden administration, the agency has said it would revisit those rules.
Payday loans—short-term loans that tend to carry high interest rates—are a common predatory lender product. Also called "cash advances," the loans are based on how much you earn and typically require a paystub to obtain. In addition to charging high fees, which often approach an annual percentage rate (APR) of 400%, payday lenders can also employ aggressive tactics to collect late payments.
Many of the 12 million people per year who use payday loans come from vulnerable segments of the population, according to Pew Charitable Trusts. These include Black borrowers, low wage earners, and people without a college degree. In fact, one study found that Black wage earners are three times as likely as White wage earners—and Latinx wage earners are twice as likely—to take out a payday loan. The use of payday loans has also been linked to a doubling in bankruptcy rates.
The annual percentage rate (APR) that payday loans often approach—one reason these loans are considered a predatory product.
Payday loan regulations
Oversight of payday loans has largely been left to the states, though federal laws provide some protections for borrowers. TILA, for example, requires payday lenders—just like other financial institutions—to disclose the cost of loans to borrowers, including finance charges and the APR.
At the state level, payday loans are typically governed by usury laws, which limit how high interest rates can be set. Most states allow APRs in the triple digits, but 18 states and Washington, D.C., have implemented rate caps low enough to effectively ban payday loans. Illinois is poised to join them, after legislators passed a bill in February capping rates at 36%.
But even in states with restrictions, lenders can often circumvent local laws by partnering with banks from states without such rate limits—a practice called “rent-a-bank.” A new rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in October 2020 makes such partnerships even easier, which consumer advocacy groups warn could promote predatory lending.
The CFPB took steps to strengthen payday loan user protections under the Obama administration, requiring payday lenders to determine during the underwriting process whether a borrower can repay the loan and restricting aggressive collection tactics by lenders for late payments. However, under the Trump administration, the agency revoked the mandatory underwriting rule in July 2020.
Car Title Loans
A car title loan, like an auto loan, uses your car’s title as collateral. But while an auto loan is used to help purchase the car, the money from a title loan can be used for any purpose. More important, short-term, high-interest title loans can be predatory. Lenders often target people who might have difficulty repaying the loan, which could force them to refinance at ballooning costs and potentially lose their car.
About one in five car title loan borrowers ends up having their vehicle seized, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Car title loan regulations
Like payday loans, car title loans are regulated by states. Overall, about half of all states allow car title loans. Some states group them with payday loans and regulate them with usury laws, capping the rate that lenders can charge. Others treat them as they do pawnshops, thus the alternative term “title pawn.” In Georgia, for example, a bill has been introduced to bring title pawns—which can carry an APR of up to 300% under the state’s pawnshop regulations—under the state’s usury laws, which cap interest rates at 36%
The CFPB's mandatory underwriting rule for payday loans, which the Trump administration recently revoked, would have also covered most title-lending activities. In the 16 states that allow title loans requiring lump-sum payments—rather than letting borrowers pay off these loans in installments—lenders would have had to assess whether a borrower could repay the loan before granting it.
Can Regulations Keep Up With Technology?
The rapid growth in online and app-based lending presents new challenges for consumer protection. The fintech sector’s share of personal loan originations doubled over four years to account for about half the market in September 2019, according to credit reporting firm Experian. And half of the revenue in payday lending is generated by online players, according to the CFPB.
Since online lenders often use a “rent-a-bank” business model, partnering with a bank to avoid state usury laws and other regulations, predatory lending tactics can be difficult to enforce, some consumer advocates argue. While states have found some success in cracking down on online lenders' predatory tactics in court, federal regulators under the Trump administration implemented rules on bank partnerships that could limit states’ abilities to enforce their laws.
The Bottom Line
Despite decades of progress in protecting borrowers, predatory lending remains an ongoing and evolving risk. If you’re in need of money, it helps to do your homework by exploring alternative funding options, reading the small print of credit terms, and educating yourself about consumer rights and protections and the range of rates for the type of loan you seek. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has tips on how mortgage borrowers can protect themselves and the CFPB has advice on payday loans and how to avoid scam.