Racial Diversity in the Judiciary

Minority groups are significantly underrepresented in the U.S. judicial system

The judicial system in the United States has historically been dominated by a virtually all-white judiciary. Having judges who represent the diversity of the nation is important for justice, but it still has largely not been achieved.

The first person of color to serve as a federal judge was Black attorney and former Virgin Islands Gov. William H. Hastie, who was appointed to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit by then-President Harry Truman in 1949. He served until 1971 and was named chief justice of the U.S. Court of Appeals in 1968.

Today, more members of minority groups serve as judges but are still vastly outnumbered. Minority group members make up just 18% of all justices.

This assessment starts with examining the history of the U.S. legal and judiciary system, what the situation is today, and where the nation can go from here.

Key Takeaways

  • Today, members of minority groups make up 18% of all justices.
  • At the highest level of the judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court, only four of the 116 justices in U.S. history have been people of color.
  • Even when slavery ended, continued legal barriers and pervasive race discrimination delayed the progression of non-white Americans into the judiciary until the 20th century.

A History of Racism

When Macon Bolling Allen tried to become a lawyer in the U.S. in 1844, he faced many difficulties. Even though the only requirement for that position in Maine at the time was to have good character, he was denied because, as a Black person, he was not considered a citizen. To overcome this barrier, he passed the bar exam and did become a lawyer, but was not able to find work because few people were willing to hire a Black attorney. Many historians believe Allen moved to Maine to pursue a legal career because it was an anti-slavery state.

During the Reconstruction era, which began in 1865 after the Civil War ended, attempts were made to rectify the injustice of slavery, but changes didn’t come to the judiciary for a number of years. Several barriers had to be removed first. While the 13th Amendment abolished slavery in 1865, it wasn’t until the 14th Amendment in 1868 that Black and other non-white people born in the U.S. were considered citizens. And it wasn’t until the 15th Amendment in 1870 that non-white male citizens were legally given the right to vote.

By then, laws were in place setting barriers to keep non-white men from voting. (Women did not gain the right to vote until the 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920.) That struggle continues to this day, as the debate over H.R. 1, the voting rights act currently in the House of Representatives, demonstrates.

First Inroads: The Legal Profession

Judges generally start out by becoming lawyers. The legal profession was where members of minority groups made their first inroads into the U.S. legal system.

In 1869, George Lewis Ruffin became the first Black American to graduate from Harvard Law School. Ruffin later served on the Boston City Council, was elected to the Massachusetts legislature, and became a municipal judge in Charlestown, Mass., in 1883.

As members of minority groups began to go to law school, they faced severe racism and other roadblocks. In 1872, Charlotte E. Ray became the first woman of color to be a lawyer in the U.S. She graduated from Howard University, a historically Black college. However, racial prejudice made it impossible for her to sustain her practice, and she eventually became a teacher.

In 1886, Hong Yen Chang became the first Asian American to graduate from Columbia University, and in 1888, he became the first Asian American to become a lawyer in the United States. The Chinese Exclusion Act, a law prohibiting the immigration of all Chinese laborers, initially prevented him from being admitted to the bar, but the New York State Legislature passed a law allowing him to be admitted. When Chang moved to California to practice law, he was denied the right to practice in California. His case eventually went to the California Supreme Court, where he was still denied the right to practice law in that state.

Albert Gallatin McIntosh is believed to be the first Native American lawyer in the U.S., admitted to practice in 1899 after studying law under E.W. Turner of Carthage, Okla. He was a member of the Creek People, or Muscogee, a group of indigenous peoples of the Southeast Woodlands. McIntosh served as superintendent of schools in connection with his legal practice and was a member of the Sequoyah Constitutional Convention, a Native American-led attempt to secure state territory for Native Americans. It was rejected by the government, despite winning the popular vote.

The first Latinx attorney to argue a case before the U.S. Supreme Court was Gustavo Garcia in 1954. He won Hernandez v. Texas, a case that extended constitutional rights to Mexican Americans.

Moving Into the Judiciary

The judicial branch of the federal government, separate from state courts, was established by the Judiciary Act of 1789, one of the first acts of the U.S. Congress. It was signed into law by President George Washington.

It took 160 years, until 1949, for a person of color, the previously mentioned William H. Hastie, to be appointed to serve as a judge at the federal level. It took even longer for the first non-Black jurists of color to be appointed to the federal bench:

  • In 1961, Reynaldo Guerra Garza became the first Latinx federal judge. He was appointed by then-President John F. Kennedy and served on the district court in the Southern District of Texas, and later served as the chief judge of the court.
  • Herbert Choy became the first Asian American federal judge when he was appointed by then-President Richard Nixon in 1971. He was a circuit court judge in the Ninth Circuit.
  • Billy Michael Burrage was the first Native American judge. He was appointed to the district courts by then-President Bill Clinton in 1994.

At the federal level, all judges are appointed by the president of the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. The judicial race barrier was breached much earlier at the state level, where some judges are appointed and many are elected, depending on each state’s rules. The stories of two of these early jurists vividly show the barriers that they faced.

According to political encyclopedia website Ballotpedia, the first African American became a justice of a state court in 1870. That’s when Jonathan Jasper Wright, the first Black attorney in Pennsylvania—who had moved to South Carolina and become involved in Republican politics—was appointed to the South Carolina Supreme Court. He served until 1877, when he resigned after the post-Reconstruction legislature, controlled by Democrats, tried to impeach him on corruption charges.

James Dean, a Black attorney in Florida, is believed to be the first elected judge of color. He was elected at the county (not state) level in 1888. Dean was suspended from his position less than eight months later by the governor of Florida for breaking anti-miscegenation laws for issuing a marriage license to a couple of Cuban descent, who allegedly were of two different races. In 2002, then-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush reinstated his judgeship through a proclamation.

Lawyers Today: How Diverse?

A recent U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics report shows low racial diversity among lawyers today. Of the total number of lawyers in the country, 5.4% are Black, 4.7% are Asian, and 6.9% are Latinx.

This job report did not include information on Native American lawyers. However, a separate study reported by the American Bar Association stated that Native American attorneys in the U.S. make up just 0.4% of lawyers.

Federal Court Judges: Racial Diversity Today

The U.S. federal court system is made up of three main levels: district courts (the general trial courts), circuit courts (the court of appeals), and the Supreme Court (the highest court level in the judicial system).

Currently, 301 of the 1,398 sitting federal judges identify as a member of a racial minority group. This group amounts to 22% of the sitting judges in the federal judiciary; 78% are white.

Here’s a breakdown of how racial diversity plays out at all levels of the federal system.

District Courts

The district court system is where the general trial courts occur. All federal court cases begin in the district courts, including civil and criminal cases.

There are 94 district courts across the country. White jurists make up 72.4% of the total judges at the district court level, and jurists from other population groups make up 27.53%, a little more than a fourth of the total.

Circuit Courts

The circuit court system is the appellate court system, or the court of appeals. Once a ruling is made in a district court, the case can be appealed to the circuit court. It is a higher level of court where the decision of the district court can be reviewed and potentially changed.

There are 13 U.S. circuit courts. They are organized into 12 circuits covering different regions of the country. These circuit courts hear the appealed cases of the district courts. The 13th circuit is the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which has nationwide jurisdiction over special subject matters.

Across these 13 circuit courts, white jurists make up 77.14% of the total at the circuit court level, more than three-quarters. Members of minority groups make up 22.87% of judges, less than a fourth. There are no Native American judges on the circuit courts.

Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest level of the federal court system. Once a ruling is made in a circuit court, the case can be appealed to the Supreme Court, which has the final say on the matter.

Nine justices serve on the Supreme Court. Currently, six of these justices are white, two are Black, and one is Latinx, meaning one-third are people of color.

On April 7, 2022, the U.S. Senate confirmed the appointment of Ketanji Brown Jackson to the U.S. Supreme Court by a vote of 53-47. She became the first Black woman to serve on the court when she succeeded retiring Justice Stephen Breyer.

In 1967, Thurgood Marshall was the first Black jurist appointed to the Supreme Court, 178 years after the federal judicial system was established. The second Black justice, Clarence Thomas, who still sits on the court, was appointed in 1991, after Marshall’s retirement. In 2009, Sonia Sotomayor became the first person of Latin descent appointed to the Supreme Court.

Of the 116 justices who have served on the Supreme Court, only these three and new Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson have been people of color, a meager 3.45%.

State Court Justices: Racial Diversity Today

The charts below show the racial diversity at the three different levels in the state court system. The state court system varies state by state, but most states follow a structure similar to the federal system and have several levels, which include a general trial level, an appellate level, and a state Supreme Court level. Overall, there is even less diversity in the state system than at the federal level.

The data shows that white jurists make up more than 80% of state court judges at all levels of the system. At the highest levels of the state courts, state Supreme Courts, racial minority groups have an even lower level of representation than at the two lower levels, making up only 15.5% of judges.

Judges of the Future

Although minority groups have made progress in the federal and state judiciary, there is still work to do to make sure that the judiciary represents the diverse U.S. population.

Attending law school and becoming a lawyer is not the only way to become a judge on the federal judiciary, but it is where many future judges get their start. Admitting more members of minority groups to law school can help open paths to a more diverse and representative judiciary.

Federal judges are appointed for life; the courts and districts over which they preside can be heavily influenced by the appointed judges. The position that these judges hold and the authority they have are a vital part of the American government. Appointing and electing members of minority groups to these positions is the most obvious and direct way to diversify the judiciary.

With minority group jurists representing less than a quarter of the members of the judiciary, racial diversity must keep progressing to ensure inclusivity and fairness for all the people whom the courts serve.

How diverse is the judiciary?

Across each level of the judiciary, racial diversity remains low. At the U.S. Supreme Court level, just three of the nine justices are people of color: Clarence Thomas, the second Black justice in U.S. history; Sonia Sotomayor, the first Latina Supreme Court justice; and Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman Supreme Court justice.

Across the federal court system, 22% identify as being a member of a racial minority group, or 301 of 1,398 sitting federal judges.

In the state court system, diversity is lower. Just 17% of trial courts, 20% of appellate courts, and 15.5% of state Supreme Courts are people of color, respectively.

Among lawyers in the United States, 5.4% are Black, 4.7% are Asian, and 6.9% are Latinx. Meanwhile, the American Bar Association shows that just 0.4% of U.S. lawyers are Native American.

Why is diversity important in the judiciary?

Given the diverse U.S. population, many have argued that the judiciary should reflect the population that it serves. Not only that, but the presence of a diverse judiciary can also have consequences on case outcomes, public morality, and confidence in the state’s fairness and legitimacy.

For instance, one study shows that Black judges are more likely to vote for affirmative action programs than non-Black judges.

Second, when there is increased diversity, broader perspectives can be taken that speak to the contours of political-moral questions, new resolutions, or new developments.

Finally, trust in the judicial system is far lower among Black Americans, where men are almost six times more likely to be incarcerated during their lifetime than white men.

Is the federal judiciary diverse?

Each level of the federal judiciary lacks racial diversity, a trend that has persisted over history.

Within district courts, just over 27% of judges are diverse. Like district courts, 22.8% of judges identify as being a member of minority groups. One-third of the U.S. Supreme Court is racially diverse, with three of nine justices being non-white.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Vanderbilt University, Jean and Alexander Heard Libraries, Robert Penn Warren’s Who Speaks for the Negro? “William Hastie.”

  2. Brennan Center for Justice. “State Supreme Court Diversity — May 2022 Update.”

  3. The Pew Charitable Trusts. “State Supreme Courts Are (Slowly) Starting to Look More Like America.”

  4. U.S. Supreme Court. “The Court as an Institution.”

  5. Sites at Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson Law, Inside Entrepreneurship Law Blog. “Entrepreneur from History | Macon Bolling Allen, Esq. — America’s First Black Lawyer.”

  6. Library of Congress. “The African American Odyssey: A Quest for Full Citizenship.”

  7. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. “15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Voting Rights (1870).”

  8. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. “19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Women’s Right to Vote (1920).”

  9. Congress.gov, U.S. Congress. “H.R.1 — For the People Act of 2021.”

  10. The Massachusetts Historical Society. “Long Road to Justice: The African American Experience in the Massachusetts Courts: George Lewis Ruffin.”

  11. Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. “Newsroom: Black History Month: Celebrating Charlotte E. Ray.”

  12. Columbia University, Columbia Law School. “Remembering Hong Yen Chang 1886.”

  13. Columbia University, Columbia Law School. “Chinese Legal Studies Center Named for Hong Yen Chang 1886, the First Chinese Lawyer in the U.S.

  14. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. “Chinese Exclusion Act (1882).”

  15. The George Washington University Law School, Student Briefs. “Paper Sons and Daughters: A Brief History of Chinese Exclusion in America.”

  16. Internet Archive. “A History of the State of Oklahoma,” Page 345.

  17. Bullock Texas State History Museum. “Hernandez v. Texas.”

  18. U.S. Courts. “Anniversary of the Federal Court System.”

  19. Texas State Historical Association. “Garza, Reynaldo Guerra (1915–2004).”

  20. Congressional Research Service. “U.S. Circuit and District Court Judges: Profile of Select Characteristics,” Page 7 (Page 11 of PDF).

  21. Jon R. Bond and Kevin B. Smith, via Google Books. “Analyzing American Democracy: Politics and Political Science.”

  22. Ballotpedia. “Jonathan Jasper Wright.”

  23. Florida House of Representatives. “The Florida Handbook: The Judicial Branch,” Pages 174–175.

  24. The Florida Bar. “‘Finally, Justice Has Arrived’: 113 Years Later, Governor Reinstates Florida’s First Black Judge.”

  25. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey.”

  26. American Bar Association. “Profile of the Legal Profession,” Page 13 (Page 18 of PDF).

  27. U.S. Department of Justice. “Introduction to the Federal Court System.”

  28. Federal Judicial Center. “Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges, 1789–Present.”

  29. U.S. Courts. “Court Role and Structure.”

  30. American Constitution Society. “January 20, 2021 Snapshot: Diversity of the Federal Bench.”

  31. U.S. Supreme Court. “Current Members.”

  32. The White House. “The Senate Confirms Ketanji Brown Jackson.”

  33. U.S. Senate. “Roll Call Vote 117th Congress — 2nd Session.”

  34. University of Miami, News. “What Does Jackson’s SCOTUS Appointment Mean for the Nation?

  35. U.S. Courts. “Justice Thurgood Marshall Profile — Brown v. Board of Education Re-enactment.”

  36. The White House Archives: Obama Administration. “Background on Judge Sonia Sotomayor.”

  37. Princeton University. “Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts.”

  38. Joy Milligan, via New York University Law Review. “Pluralism in America: Why Judicial Diversity Improves Legal Decisions About Political Morality.”

  39. Brennan Center for Justice. “State Supreme Court Diversity.”