Understanding Anti-Dumping Duty: Definition, Process, and Examples

What Is an Anti-Dumping Duty?

An anti-dumping duty is a protectionist measure a government uses to safeguard its economy from foreign imports priced lower than their fair market value. This tariff aims to protect local businesses by preventing foreign companies from flooding the market with cheaply priced goods. However, while designed to protect domestic industries, these duties can also lead to higher prices for local consumers and might impact international competition negatively. Here's a detailed look at how anti-dumping duties work, including real-world examples.

Key Takeaways

  • Anti-dumping duties are protectionist tariffs imposed to protect domestic industries from foreign products sold below fair market value.
  • While aiming to save domestic jobs, anti-dumping duties can result in higher consumer prices and reduced competition.
  • In the U.S., the International Trade Commission, following recommendations from the Department of Commerce, imposes these duties.
  • The World Trade Organization regulates international anti-dumping measures but does not intervene in individual dumping cases.
  • A notable example occurred in 2016 when the U.S. imposed significant anti-dumping duties on steel imports from China following a complaint from American steel companies.
Anti-Dumping Duty

Investopedia / Mira Norian

How Anti-Dumping Duties Impact Economics and Trade

In the U.S., the International Trade Commission (ITC)–an independent government agency–is tasked with imposing anti-dumping duties. Their actions are based on recommendations they receive from the U.S. Department of Commerce and investigations by the ITC and/or the Department of Commerce. 

In many cases, the duties imposed on these goods exceed the value of the goods. Anti-dumping duties are typically levied when a foreign company is selling an item significantly below the price at which it is being produced.

Although anti-dumping duties aim to save jobs, they can cause higher consumer prices. Over time, anti-dumping duties may lower international competition for domestic companies.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) sets international trade rules, including those for anti-dumping measures. The WTO does not intervene in the activities of companies engaged in dumping. Instead, it focuses on how governments can—or cannot—react to the practice of dumping. The WTO allows governments to act against dumping if it harms an industry or hinders a new one in their country.

This intervention must be justified in order to uphold the WTO's commitment to free-market principles. Anti-dumping duties can distort the market, as governments in a free market usually can't set fair prices.

Real-World Example: Anti-Dumping Duties on Steel Imports

In June 2015, American steel companies United States Steel Corp., Nucor Corp., Steel Dynamics Inc., ArcelorMittal USA, AK Steel Corp., and California Steel Industries, Inc. filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Commerce and the ITC. Their complaint alleged that several countries, including China, were dumping steel into the U.S. market and keeping prices unfairly low.

After conducting a review, one year later the U.S. announced that it would be imposing a total of 522% combined anti-dumping and countervailing import duties on certain steel imported from China. In 2018, China filed a complaint with the WTO challenging the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Since then, the Trump administration has continued to use the WTO to challenge what it claims are unfair trading practices by the Chinese government and other trading partners.

The Bottom Line

Anti-dumping duties serve as a crucial tool for governments to protect domestic industries from unfair overseas competition. By imposing tariffs on imports priced below market value, these duties aim to safeguard local businesses and economies. While the intention is to protect jobs, it can result in higher prices for consumers and potentially reduce international competitiveness. Key organizations like the U.S. International Trade Commission and the World Trade Organization regulate these measures to maintain fair trade practices. The example of the U.S. steel industry illustrates the impact and complexity of implementing such duties. Understanding these dynamics is essential for businesses and policymakers navigating international trade.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. U.S. International Trade Commission. "Understanding Antidumping & Countervailing Duty Investigations."

  2. World Trade Organization. "Technical Information on Anti-Dumping."

  3. World Trade Organization. "General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade," Page 36.

  4. International Trade Administration. "Commerce Initiates Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Investigations of Imports of Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from China, India, Italy, Korea, and Taiwan," Pages 1 and 5.

  5. International Trade Administration. "Commerce Finds Dumping of Imports of Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the People’s Republic of China and Japan, and Countervailable Subsidization of Imports of Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the People’s Republic of China," Page 1.

  6. World Trade Organization. "China Files WTO Complaint Over the United States’ Tariff Measures on Chinese Goods."

  7. World Trade Organization. "China — Additional Duties on Certain Products from the United States."

Related Articles