DEFINITION of 'Anti-Takeover Statute'

An anti-takeover statute is a set of state regulations that prevent or deter companies from attempting hostile takeovers. These regulations vary across state lines and typically affect only the companies incorporated within the state.

BREAKING DOWN 'Anti-Takeover Statute'

Although anti-takeover statutes are meant to restrict predatory takeovers, they will sometimes be detrimental to shareholders by preventing companies from partaking in profitable or justified takeovers.

A corporate charter — simply referred to as "charter" or "articles of incorporation" — is a written document filed with a U.S. state by the founders of a corporation detailing the major components of a company such as its objectives, its structure and its planned operations. If the charter is approved by the state government, the company becomes a legal corporation. It's referred to as "charter" and "articles of incorporation." Businesses organizing under the corporation form (incorporation), rather than sole-proprietor or a partnership structure, will often carefully select which U.S. state they formally file a charter under because the laws and regulations will defer from state to state. Delaware, for instance, is generally considered a pro-business friendly environment given its flexible business law structure.

At the state level, the inclusion of anti-takeover statutes (ATSs) on firm and managerial behavior is largely mixed, possibly even overstated. Because most firms have access to other, more powerful takeover defenses — specifically, poison pills and similar techniques — standard anti-takeover statutes do not materially increase a company’s ability to resist a hostile takeover bid. Savvy corporate executives and their legions of tax, legal, and financial consultants have found numerous methods to sidestep state level antitakeover statutes which are often slow to adjust to changing business environments given the clumsy and lengthy legislative process.

Although seemingly a topic most appealing to those drawn to specialized legal debates; effective anti-takeover statutes do play a big role in determining whether the threat of takeovers acts as a disciplining device or induces a sense of short-termism. More recently, the debate has centered on markets taking on a hyper short-term focus.

RELATED TERMS
  1. Anti-Takeover Measure

    In order to block hostile bids for control of a company, the ...
  2. Voting Poison Pill Plan

    An anti-takeover strategy in which the company being targeted ...
  3. Corporate Charter

    A corporate charter sets forth a corporation's basic information, ...
  4. Takeover

    A takeover occurs when an acquiring company makes a bid in an ...
  5. Opt-Out Vote

    An opt-out vote is a shareholder vote undertaken to determine ...
  6. Black Knight

    A black knight is a company that makes an unwelcome takeover ...
Related Articles
  1. Small Business

    Corporate Takeover Defense: A Shareholder's Perspective

    Find out the strategies corporations use to protect themselves from unwanted acquisitions.
  2. Investing

    Mergers And Acquisitions: Understanding Takeovers

    In the language of mergers and acquisitions, battleground terms meld with bizarre metaphors to create a unique vocabulary.
  3. Investing

    Charter Offers $1B In Senior Unsecured Notes

    Charter Communications said it is offering $1 billion in senior unsecured notes due in 2027.
  4. Investing

    TCI: A Big Stock Buyback Is Coming at Charter

    Hedge fund TCI thinks Charter Communications could be a target for Verizon.
  5. Investing

    Charter Shares Rise on Verizon Buyout Talk

    Charter shares gained this week after Verizon's CEO said a deal would make 'industrial sense.'
  6. Investing

    Charter Sued Over Internet Speeds by NY's AG

    Charter Communications is being sued by New York's Attorney General over slow internet service.
  7. Investing

    Charter: HSBC Initiates Coverage With $270 PT

    Charter Communications gets a hold rating and a price target that implies a 10% decline.
  8. Investing

    Charter and TWC Receive FTC Merger Approval (CHTR, TWC)

    While the FTC has given its green light, the deal must still be approved by the California Public Utilities Commission, which will vote on the deal May 12.
  9. Insights

    Charter-Time Warner Cable Merger Wins Approval (TWC, CHTR)

    Charter Communications won preliminary approval Monday for its takeover of Time Warner Cable, but the deal will be subject to strict conditions.
  10. Investing

    Charter CEO: We Don’t Need a Content Buy (CHTR)

    Charter CEO Tom Rutledge said the cable company doesn't need to make a content buy but didn't rule out cable acquisitions.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What happens to the shares of a company that has been the object of a hostile takeover?

    Learn about the effect on the share price of companies that are targets of hostile takeovers, which are tactics used by famed ... Read Answer >>
  2. A Hostile Takeover vs. Friendly Takeover

    Most takeovers are friendly, but hostile takeovers and activist campaigns have become more popular lately with the risk of ... Read Answer >>
  3. What are some of the top hostile takeovers of all-time?

    Learn about some of the most noteworthy hostile takeovers in history, including the KKR acquisition of RJR Nabisco and the ... Read Answer >>
  4. What is the difference between a merger and a takeover?

    In a general sense, mergers and takeovers (or acquisitions) are very similar corporate actions - they combine two previously ... Read Answer >>
  5. What is the significance of a Schedule 13D?

    A Schedule 13D is significant because it provides investors with useful information on everything an investor could want ... Read Answer >>
Trading Center