What Is Bail-In?
A bail-in provides relief to a financial institution on the brink of failure by requiring the cancellation of debts owed to creditors and depositors. A bail-in is the opposite of a bailout, which involves the rescue of a financial institution by external parties, typically governments, using taxpayers’ money for funding. Bailouts help to keep creditors from losses while bail-ins mandate creditors take losses.
Bail-ins and bailouts arise out of necessity rather than choice. Both offer options for helping institutions in a crisis. Bailouts were a powerful tool in the 2008 Financial Crisis, but bail-ins have their place as well.
Investors and deposit-holders in a troubled financial institution would prefer to keep the organization solvent rather than face the alternative of losing the full value of their investments or deposits in a crisis. Governments also would prefer not to let a financial institution fail because a large-scale bankruptcy could increase the likelihood of systemic problems for the market. These risks are why bailouts were used in the 2008 Financial Crisis and the concept of ‘too big to fail’ led to widespread reform.
Bail-Ins across the Globe
While most investors are familiar with bailouts and their uses, bail-ins are also a stratagem of economists. Europe has incorporated them to solve many of its greatest challenges. The Bank of International Settlement (BIS) has also spoke openly about how bail-ins can be used with a focus on integrations in the European Union. In these scenarios, as is typical for bail-ins, the stratagem is used in cases where a full government bailout is unlikely. Generally, bail-ins are instituted because (a) a financial institution's collapse is not likely to create a systemic problem and lacks "too big to fail" consequences (b) the government does not possess the financial resources necessary for a bailout, or (c) the resolution framework requires that a bail-in be used to mitigate the amount of taxpayers’ funds allocated.
- A bail-in provides relief to a financial institution on the brink of failure by requiring the cancellation of debts owed to creditors and depositors.
- Bail-ins and bailouts are both resolution schemes used in distressed situations.
- Bailouts help to keep creditors from losses while bail-ins mandate creditors take losses.
- Bail-in schemes are being more broadly considered across the globe as a first phase resolution to help mitigate the amount of taxpayers’ funds used in supporting distressed entities.
Real World Examples
Cyprus and European Union resolutions provide two examples of bail-ins in action.
The Cyprus Experiment
While the general public became familiar with the subject of bailouts in the aftermath of the Great Recession of 2008, bail-ins attracted attention in 2013 after government officials resorted to the strategy in Cyprus. As discussed in “The National Herald,” the consequences were that uninsured depositors (defined in the European Union as people with deposits larger than 100,000 euros) in the Bank of Cyprus lost a substantial portion of their deposits. In return, the depositors received bank stock. However, the value of these stocks did not equate to most depositors’ losses.
In 2018, the European Union is also looking at more broadly incorporating bail-ins into its resolution framework. In a speech at the IADI-ERC International Conference, Fernando Restoy from the Bank for International Settlements discussed the bail-in plans. In the European Union, a new resolution framework is being considered that would potentially incorporate both bail-ins and bailouts. Bail-ins would be involved in the first phase of a resolution, requiring a specified amount of funds to be written off before bailout funds would become available.