Best-Price Rule (Rule 14D-10)

By
James Chen
Full Bio

James Chen, CMT is an expert trader, investment adviser, and global market strategist.

Learn about our editorial policies
Updated April 29, 2022
Reviewed by
JeFreda R. Brown
Dr. Brown
Reviewed by JeFreda R. Brown
Full Bio
Dr. JeFreda R. Brown is a financial consultant, Certified Financial Education Instructor, and researcher who has assisted thousands of clients over a more than two-decade career. She is the CEO of Xaris Financial Enterprises and a course facilitator for Cornell University.
Learn about our Financial Review Board
Fact checked by
Yarilet Perez
Yarilet Perez
Fact checked by Yarilet Perez
Full Bio

Yarilet Perez is an experienced multimedia journalist and fact-checker with a Master of Science in Journalism. She has worked in multiple cities covering breaking news, politics, education, and more. Her expertise is in personal finance and investing, and real estate.

Learn about our editorial policies

Definition of Best-Price Rule (Rule 14D-10)

Best-price rule (Rule 14D-10) is a regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that stipulates that consideration offered to any security holder in a tender offer must be equal to the highest consideration paid to any other security holder. The best-price rule is meant to provide equal treatment to all holders of securities in a tender offer.

Understanding Best-Price Rule (Rule 14D-10)

The Best-price rule (Rule 14D-10), as originally written, required fine-tuning, as disputes arose over how to treat certain employment compensation, severance and other employee benefit agreements in a situation of change of control that a completed tender offer created. If some high-level employees who held securities were to receive additional monies in a tender offer, would all other security holders be entitled to receive the same amount?

Amendments to Rule 14D-10

To provide clarity of the rule, the SEC made amendments that went into effect in December 2006. The rule was amended in three ways: First, the central language of the rule was changed to: "consideration paid to any security holder for securities tendered in the tender offer is the highest consideration paid to any other security holder for securities tendered in the tender offer." The focus on "securities tendered" excludes any other compensatory agreements in the amount of consideration due to security holders. Second, compensatory arrangements were exempted from the rule. Any amounts to be paid pursuant to an arrangement will have to be "paid or granted as compensation for past services performed, future services to be performed, or future services to be refrained from performing, by the security holder (and matters incidental thereto)" and may "not [be] calculated based on the number of securities tendered or to be tendered in the tender offer by the security holder." Third, a safe harbor was instituted in the rule for compensation arrangements approved by a committee of independent directors.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.

  1. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 200 and 240: Final Rule, Amendments to the Tender Offer Best-Price Rules," Pages 6-9. Accessed April 16, 2021.

  2. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 200 and 240: Final Rule, Amendments to the Tender Offer Best-Price Rules," Page 2. Accessed April 16, 2021.

  3. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 200 and 240: Final Rule, Amendments to the Tender Offer Best-Price Rules," Page 10 and 11. Accessed April 16, 2021.

  4. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 200 and 240: Final Rule, Amendments to the Tender Offer Best-Price Rules," Page 13 and 58. Accessed April 16, 2021.

  5. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Securities and Exchange Commission, 17 CFR Parts 200 and 240: Final Rule, Amendments to the Tender Offer Best-Price Rules," Page 4 and 5. Accessed April 16, 2021.

Take the Next Step to Invest
×
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.
Service
Name
Description