What Is Cross Holding?

Cross holding is a situation in which a publicly-traded corporation owns stock in another publicly-traded company. So, technically, listed corporations own securities issued by other listed corporations. Cross holding can lead to double-counting, whereby the equity of each company is counted twice when determining value, which can result in estimating the wrong value of the two companies.

Key Takeaways

  • Cross holding happens when a publicly-traded company owns a stake in another publicly-traded company. 
  • The biggest issue with cross-holding is that the value of equity for each company is double-counted, leading to a wrong valuation. 
  • Critics also argue cross-holding hinders the effort to improve corporate governance and hold management teams accountable.

How Cross Holding Works

Companies that have cross-holdings, also known as cross-shareholdings, are susceptible to confusion and management holdout in cases of company mergers and acquisitions (M&A) because one company might refuse consent to the other, and vice versa. 

Markets in Britain and the U.S. have long enjoyed capitalism marked by a dispersed base of owners. In continental Europe, by contrast, ownership tends to be concentrated among a tight unit of insiders. The reasons differ from country to country. In France, it’s a combination of the state's wish to see big business in friendly hands and the lack of institutional investors.

Elsewhere, savvy dealing with dynasties such as Sweden's Wallenberg and Italy's Agnellis have played a bigger role. Until recently, it was difficult to know just how closely held Europe's companies were, because disclosure standards were lax. New and tougher standards, are making things clearer.

In Japan, the keiretsu is a long-standing tradition of companies with interlocking business relationships and shareholdings. As an informal business group, members companies own small portions of the shares in each other's companies. This system helps insulate each company from stock market fluctuations and takeover attempts, thus enabling long-term planning in projects.

Criticism of Cross Holding

Critics contend the practice of building cross or “strategic” shareholdings between listed corporations contributes significantly to the docility of shareholder registers, the complacency of failing management teams, and the difficulty of building real momentum behind the push for better stewardship and corporate governance. Shareholders pushing for improved corporate governance standards are increasingly asking for more detailed outlines of the economic rationale for cross-holdings.

Also, if Company A holds stocks or bonds in Company B, the value of this security might be counted twice, in error, because these securities would be counted when determining the value of the company issuing the security, and again when looking over the securities held by the other company.

Example of Cross Holding 


An example of cross-holding is Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A). Berkshire invests in various publicly traded companies as part of its business strategy. As of the end of 2019, Berkshire owns the likes of Apple (AAPL), Bank of America (BAC), and Coca-Cola (KO). Berkshire’s largest holding is Apple, it owns nearly $72 billion worth of stock. Buffett’s company owns almost 5.5% of Apple.