What is 'Dark Money'

Dark money refers to the funds donated to nonprofit organizations that in turn spend it in order to influence elections. These nonprofit organizations can receive an unlimited amount of donations, and they're not required to disclose their donors. The opacity of this donation process often allows these companies to significantly influence the election process.


Dark money groups are similar to political action committees (PACs) and super PACs in some aspects: They can spend unlimited amounts of money on a campaign and are not directly affiliated with the candidates. However, dark money groups are regulated by the IRS while PACs are regulated by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), which gives them different allowances. Super PACs must disclose their donors, while dark money groups are exempt. Super PACs are also required to disclose their expenses; while dark money groups must also do so through taxes, the process is often delayed until a year or more after the elections. However, while Super PACs can be formed purely for political reasons, dark money groups cannot spend the majority of their funds for political purposes.

The Political Influence of Dark Money

In recent years, dark money groups have surpassed even traditional PACs and super PACS in election spending. One of the largest and most well-known entities is the network of the Koch brothers, Charles and David Koch, conservative business moguls whose spending accounted for about a quarter of the dark money used to influence the 2012 elections.

While the 2010 and 2012 elections saw enormous dark money contributions, the 2014 midterm elections saw the highest amount of dark money spent in a congressional election to date. This money was largely spent in swing states, or those with the most competitive races. Dark money has already been used in significant amounts in the 2016 elections.

Laws Surrounding Dark Money Groups

Two U.S. Supreme Court decisions contributed greatly to the rise of dark money groups. In the 2008 case FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Live, Inc., the Supreme Court held that issue ads, or ads that pair a candidate's name with a specific issue, may not be banned during the months preceding an election. This means that as long as the ad does not explicitly express support or opposition to a candidate, it can be aired during this "blackout period." This decision opened the doors to dark money groups to advertise throughout the election season in order to spread influence.

In the 2010 case Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court ruled that it was unlawful for the government to restrict political spending by a nonprofit corporation, which gives them the freedom to spend unlimited amounts in order to support or oppose a political candidate and influence the election process. This case was also extended to for-profit corporations and other entities.

  1. Political Action Committee (Super ...

    Here's a look at PACS and Super Pacs and how they influence political ...
  2. Dark Pool

    A dark pool is a private financial forum or an exchange used ...
  3. Dark Pool Liquidity

    Dark pool liquidity is the trading volume created by institutional ...
  4. Planned Amortization Class (PAC) ...

    A planned amortization class (PAC) tranche is a type of asset-backed ...
  5. Restricted Fund

    A restricted fund is a reserve of money that can only be used ...
  6. Unrestricted Net Assets

    Unrestricted net assets are assets donated to nonprofit organizations ...
Related Articles
  1. Insights

    Where Presidential Candidates Get Campaign Funding

    American citizens of every political persuasion may justifiably wonder where all that money comes from and how it's spent.
  2. Insights

    What Is the Dark Net?

    The Dark Net (or Darknet) is a subset of secret websites that exist on an encrypted network.
  3. Insights

    What Happens to Campaign Contributions After Elections?

    Learn about what those contributions are used for when the candidate is no longer running.
  4. Insights

    An Introduction to Dark Pools

    Dark pools are private exchanges or forums for securities trading; unlike stock exchanges, dark pools are not accessible by the investing public.
  5. Insights

    Top 10 Contributors to the Clinton Campaign (FB, H)

    Hedge fund managers dominate this list of the top donors to Clinton's campaign.
  6. Investing

    Should You Wade Into The Dark Pools Of Liquidity?

    Dark pools of liquidity allow big investors to trade away from the public eye. They limit market impact but may leave small investors in the cold.
  7. Insights

    How Much Does it Cost to Become President?

    A lot, and it keeps growing with each election. if you're planning to make a run for the White House, start saving your money now.
  8. Insights

    How Bernie Sanders Has Avoided Big Money (Mostly)

    Bernie Sanders hasn't entirely avoided PACs with his fundraising, but he has gotten a lot of bang for the buck
  9. Insights

    Trump's Contributions Covered 20% of His Campaign's Spending

    President-elect Donald Trump has contributed $66 million toward his campaign.
  10. Insights

    Why Wall Street Won't Give Money to Trump's Campaign

    Due to SEC rules, asset managers can't give to a presidential ticket that includes Mike Pence without losing the Indiana pension fund's business.
  1. Why is the Dark Cloud Cover pattern important for traders?

    Learn the significance for traders of the dark cloud cover candlestick pattern, a bearish indicator closely related to the ... Read Answer >>
Trading Center