What is the 'Dirks Test'

Dirks Test is a standard used by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to determine whether someone who receives and acts on insider information (a tippee) is guilty of insider trading. The Dirks Test looks for two criteria: 1) whether the individual breached the company's trust (broke rules of confidentiality by disclosing material nonpublic information); and 2) whether the individual did so knowingly.

Tippees can be found guilty of insider trading if they knew or should have known that the tipper had committed a breach of fiduciary duty.

BREAKING DOWN 'Dirks Test'

The Dirks Test is named after the 1984 Supreme Court case Dirks v. SEC, which established the conditions under which tippees can be held liable for insider trading. An individual does not actually have to engage in a trade to be guilty of illegal insider trading; merely facilitating an inside trade by disclosing material nonpublic information about a company is sufficient to be liable for illegal insider trading. It is also not necessary to be a manager or employee of the company; friends and family members who have access to such information and disclose it can also be charged with committing an illegal act.

Testing the Dirks Test

The Dirks Test was unclear on one key element — whether an insider breached a duty if he or she did not receive personal benefit. Indeed, the Supreme Court highlighted that "absent some personal gain [to the insider] there has been no breach of duty to stockholders. And absent a breach by the insider there is no derivative breach [by the tippee]." In subsequent court cases, U.S. v. Newman and U.S. v. Salman, the focus on the definition of "personal benefit" provided clarification of the Dirks Test. Mathew Martoma, a former hedge fund manager with a checkered past, was convicted in 2014 for insider trading involving shares of a biotechnology company conducting pivotal trials of an Alzheimer's drug. His lawyers appealed the conviction on the grounds that the tipper, a prominent doctor and researcher at the University of Michigan, did not receive personal benefit for sharing material nonpublic data with Martoma. However, the federal appeals court upheld his conviction in 2017, citing the precedent set in the U.S. v. Salman case that a benefit need not be "pecuniary." According to the ruling, a "gift" of inside information to a relative or friend was to be considered in and of itself a personal gain to the tipper. The tipper and tippee, in this case, were deemed to be friends; therefore, the standard was met.

RELATED TERMS
  1. Tipping

    Tipping is the act of providing material non-public information ...
  2. Insider

    An insider is a director or senior officer of a company, as well ...
  3. Insider Trading Act of 1988

    The Insider Trading Act of 1988 increased the liability penalties ...
  4. Insider Trading

    Insider trading is the buying or selling of a security by someone ...
  5. Misappropriation Theory

    Misappropriation theory postulates that anyone using insider ...
  6. Inside Days

    Inside days refer to a candlestick pattern that forms after a ...
Related Articles
  1. Trading

    Defining Illegal Insider Trading

    The better you understand why insider trading can be criminal, the better you'll understand how the market works.
  2. Trading

    What Investors Can Learn From Insider Trading

    Some insider trading is actually legal - and can be extremely telling for investors.
  3. Insights

    Should Insider Trading Be Legal?

    Insider trading has become a hot-button issue. Here are some of the pros and cons to making it legal.
  4. Insights

    Insider Selling Isn't Always A Bad Sign

    Are you using insider trading as a signal for your own buying or selling strategy? You may need to reconsider the approach since rule 10b5-1 prohibit trading based on inside information.
  5. Investing

    How to use insider and institutional ownership

    Learn why insider and institution stock ownership reveal much information about the stock. Understand what to consider when making well-informed investment decisions.
  6. Financial Advisor

    Asset Manager Ethics: Rules Governing Capital Markets

    The integrity of the capital markets needs to be kept at utmost importance for all investors. This article shows how to maintain the integrity while investing.
  7. Insights

    Hedge Funds and the Law

    Learn how hedge funds have gotten in trouble for illegal insider trading. Read about questionable high-frequency trading (HFT) strategies.
  8. Insights

    Management Sells Huge Stake in Basic Energy (BAS)

    Management at Basic Energy Services have sold off a massive amount of stock recently, dumping over 2.7 million shares as stock prices climb.
  9. Investing

    Reports: Verizon, Yahoo in Discounted Deal

    A revised Verizon-Yahoo deal may involve a final price tag lowered by $300 million.
  10. Tech

    Bitcoin Price Plunges 20% After Hackers Steal $72 Million

    Bitcoin price falls 20% after a security breach at a Hong Kong-based exchange.
RELATED FAQS
  1. Can your insurance company drug test you?

    Learn why insurance companies conduct drug tests and how a lifestyle free of drugs can save you big money on health and life ... Read Answer >>
  2. How are open-market different from closed-market transactions?

    Legal insider transactions can take place in two ways: an open-market transaction or a closed-market transaction. Learn the ... Read Answer >>
  3. What happens to the fines collected by the Securities and Exchange Commission?

    When the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces a civil action against a corporation or an individual found guilty ... Read Answer >>
Trading Center