What is Economic Secession
Economic secession is a social phenomenon that occurs when currency, goods or services are exchanged outside of a traditional economic system. Such economic secession might entail removing a person or group of people from the use of fiat currency, for instance, with them instead relying on bartering or other commodity-based transactions, such as gold or durable goods.
BREAKING DOWN Economic Secession
Proponents of economic secession advance it as one way of helping reduce government influence on various economic factors and decisions, since it doesn't depend on government-sanctioned legal tender and is not subject to taxation.
Economic secession is a decision made by individuals or localities to remove themselves from a country's general economic network – thus reducing the power of the government over their lives, since it is no longer able to use its monetary policy to influence behavior.
Given these characteristics, economic secession is considered a form of Libertarianism, or even anarchism. Simple tax avoidance or resistance is one example of and rationale for economic secession.
But there are many other instances: agrarian societies that exist on bartering goods and services, anarcho-capitalism, complementary currency, various examples of local exchange trading systems, bitcoin and other types of digital or alternative currencies, etc.
Promise and Skepticism of Economic Secession
Wendell Berry, the writer, environmental activist and cultural critic, is thought to be one of the first to have coined the term economic secession, putting forth his vision in an essay tiled "Conservation and Local Economy."
In a recent 2017 interview, Berry pointed to the Amish as exemplary of his idea of what the term means:
"Certain Amish communities have economies reasonably local in orientation, starting with the economies of households and neighborhoods," said Berry. "The Amish are the only Christians that I know about who actually practise the radical neighborliness of the Gospels. Their extensive use of horses for fieldwork and transportation limits their lives and livelihoods to a neighbourly scale and keeps their work largely dependent on local energy, from sunlight and homegrown forages and grains. The Amish are the true geniuses of technology, insofar as they, almost alone, are able to refuse it when the use of it would be destructive to their community."
In another essay, however, written in 2003 for the Mises Institute, two socioeconomic theorists offered their opinions on why "Economic Secession Won't Succeed."
"Some freedom-minded people pin their hope for liberty on withdrawing from an unfree world," wrote Gene Callahan and Paul Birch. "In times of crisis, such as wars and recessions, this idea gains popularity. We might refer to this notion as "economic secession," borrowing the name from John Kennedy's article of the same title. Despairing of advancing the cause of liberty in society at large, they hope to be able to secure their own liberty anyway."
To describe the limitations for economic secession's ability to effect governmental change, they offered the following example: "What would happen if the man in the street were able to hide a larger fraction of his personal wealth or income? Would the government shrug its collective shoulders and reduce its spending? Hardly. It would merely assume that each taxpayer is hiding a similar fraction of his income and increase all tax assessments accordingly. This would penalize honesty, and in fostering anger against the tax evaders would in all likelihood encourage the introduction of ever more draconian and authoritarian laws. And the tax revenues would keep flowing just the same."