First Amendment

What Is the First Amendment?

The First Amendment, passed by Congress on Sept. 25, 1789 and ratified on Dec. 15, 1791, protects the freedoms of Speech, Religion, Press, Assembly, and Petition for Americans.

Key Takeaways

  • The First Amendment, passed by Congress on Sept. 25, 1789 and ratified on Dec. 15, 1791, protects the freedoms of Speech, Religion, Press, Assembly, and Petition for Americans.
  • Collectively these freedoms protected by the First Amendment are known as “freedom of expression.”
  • The First Amendment is a key part of the Western liberal conception of limited government.

Understanding the First Amendment

The First Amendment is the first of the original 10 amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution which were designed to protect a number of fundamental rights for Americans. The First Amendment, however, is not absolute. That is why there are prohibitions against knowingly false statements (libel laws), obscenity, and inciting violence. You cannot, for instance, yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater.

Freedoms of speech, press, right to assemble peacefully, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances are vital for a functioning democracy. Freedom of religion is enshrined by the First Amendment clause that prohibits the government from establishing one set religion for all and allows people the free practice of the religion of their choosing. The First Amendment is a hallmark of the conception of limited government.

Collectively the freedoms of Speech, Religion, Press, Assembly, and Petition are known as “freedom of expression.” From the 20th century onward, many individuals and entities have legally challenged the government when they believed their rights were under attack. In response to these legal challenges, federal courts ranging from the district courts, courts of appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as the state courts, have issued judgments in landmark First Amendment cases.

The First Amendment protects against the government penalizing expression, but it does not protect against businesses doing so.

Examples of First Amendment Cases

Many of these cases deal with freedom of speech, which is often viewed as the foundation on which the other First Amendment freedoms are based. In a business context, the right to free speech often causes the greatest controversy. In the workplace it gives rise to questions such as whether an employee can be fired for participating in a political rally or for speaking to the press about work conditions. In a more modern context, can someone be terminated for a non-work-related post on social media?

  • Schenck v. United States—This 1919 case was a landmark in this context. Charles Schenck was an antiwar activist during World War I who was arrested for sending leaflets to new armed forces recruits and enlisted men that urged them to ignore their draft notices. The Supreme Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction on the grounds that Schenck was a threat to national security through his attempts to interfere with recruitment and incite insubordination in the armed forces. In his ruling, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes defined a “clear and present danger test” to determine whether speech is protected by the First Amendment in such cases. This established the principle that an individual who is a “clear and present” danger to U.S. security would not have the right to free speech.
  • Google Employee Firing—A case involving search giant Google Inc. in August 2017 provides another example. A Google employee, James Damore, posted a 10-page memo to an internal company forum arguing that women were underrepresented in the tech industry because of “biological causes” of differences between men and women, and it criticized the company for its diversity and inclusion initiatives. The memo was subsequently leaked to the media, setting off a firestorm of outrage and a heated debate about the limits of free speech in the workplace. Damore was fired shortly thereafter because the memo violated Google’s code of conduct and crossed the line “by advancing harmful gender stereotypes,” according to Google’s CEO. What many people don’t understand is that, as the Washington Post put it at the time of the firing, “the First Amendment protects people from adverse actions by the government, but it does not generally apply to actions by private employers.” There is, after all, no guarantee of employment in the U.S. Constitution. The employee and several other employees with similar issues sued Google in January 2018. The case was dropped in May 2020.
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. U.S. Library of Congress, "Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. (47) 1919," Page 52.

  2. Washington Post. "The Google Memo Is a Reminder that We Generally Don't Have Free Speech at Work."

  3. CNET. "James Damore's Diversity Lawsuit Against Google Comes to a Quiet End."

Open a New Bank Account
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.