What is a 'Freeze Out'

A freeze-out (also referred to as a squeeze out) is an action taken by a firm's majority shareholders that pressures minority holders to sell their stakes in the company. A variety of maneuvers may be considered freeze-out tactics, such as the termination of minority shareholder employees or the refusal to declare dividends.

BREAKING DOWN 'Freeze Out'

Freeze-outs usually occur in closely-held companies, wherein the majority shareholders can converse with one another. The majority shareholders will attempt to freeze out the minority from the decision making process, rendering minority voting rights useless. Such actions may be illegal and could be overturned by the courts after review.

This action is often accomplished using an acquisition. Many states have defined what is permissible in freeze-outs through their existing statutes on corporate mergers and acquisitions.

How Freeze-Out Mergers Work

In a typical freeze-out merger, the controlling shareholder(s) may set up a new corporation that they own and control. This new company would then submit a tender offer to the other company hoping to force the minority shareholders to give up their equity position. If the tender offer is successful, the acquiring company may choose to merge their assets into the new corporation.

In this scenario, non-tendering shareholders would essentially lose their shares as the company would no longer exist. While non-tendering shareholders would generally receive compensation (cash or securities) for their shares as part of the transaction, they would no longer retain their minority ownership stake.

What Is a Freeze-Out Provision?

Corporate charters may contain a freeze-out provision that allows an acquiring company to purchase the stock of minority shareholders for fair cash value within a defined period of time after the acquisition is completed.

Laws and Fiduciary Duty

Historically, freeze-outs by controlling shareholders have faced differing levels of legal scrutiny.

In the 1952 case of Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp., the Supreme Court in Delaware established a fairness standard that would apply to all mergers, including freeze-outs. It ruled that when an acquiring company and its directors "stand on both sides of the transaction, they bear the burden of establishing the merger's entire fairness, and it must pass the test of careful scrutiny by the courts."

Although the law was once hostile to freeze-outs, they are generally more accepted in corporate acquisitions these days. Courts generally require that as part of a fair transaction, an acquisition should have both a business purpose and fair compensation for shareholders.

RELATED TERMS
  1. Minority IPO

    A minority IPO is an initial public offering in which shares ...
  2. Shareholders' Agreement

    A shareholders' agreement is an arrangement among a company's ...
  3. Closely Held Corporation

    A closely held corporation is any firm that has only a limited ...
  4. Proxy Fight

    A proxy fight occurs when a group of shareholders join forces ...
  5. Acquisition

    An acquisition is a corporate action in which one company buys ...
  6. Tender

    To tender is to invite bids for a project or accept a formal ...
Related Articles
  1. Investing

    Know your shareholder rights

    Common-stock owners have numerous privileges and should be vigilant in monitoring a company. Read on to learn what rights you have as a shareholder.
  2. Small Business

    Corporate Takeover Defense: A Shareholder's Perspective

    Find out the strategies corporations use to protect themselves from unwanted acquisitions.
  3. Investing

    The Wonderful World Of Mergers

    While acquisitions can be hostile, these varied mergers are always friendly.
  4. Investing

    Proxy Season 2016: Most Wonderful Time of the Year

    Each year, public companies hold shareholder meetings where individual and institutional investors vote on the future. Here is what to watch in 2016.
  5. Investing

    A Peek Into Shareholder Meetings

    Shareholder meetings can be glamorous, exciting or controversial, but not particularly revelatory.
  6. Investing

    When Good News Is Actually Bad News For Investors

    Learn how investors can be on the lookout for companies that spin bad news for shareholders into good news. Watch out for these types of announcements.
  7. Financial Advisor

    Acquire a career in mergers

    This exciting sector demands a lot from its advisors. Are you up for it?
  8. Investing

    Proxy Voting Gives Fund Shareholders a Say

    You have the right to take part in important company decisions by proxy.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How does a merger affect the shareholders?

    Explore the impact of a merger and understand how the process affects shareholders of the newly merged firm in terms of stock ... Read Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between a merger and a takeover?

    In a general sense, mergers and takeovers (or acquisitions) are very similar corporate actions - they combine two previously ... Read Answer >>
  3. All-stock vs All-cash M&A deal

    Mergers and acquisitions are becoming increasingly popular forms of corporate restructuring. Learn how it can affect the ... Read Answer >>
  4. What is a stock-for-stock merger and how does this corporate action affect existing ...

    First, let's be clear about what we mean by a stock-for-stock merger. When a merger or acquisition is conducted, there are ... Read Answer >>
  5. Why do companies merge with or acquire other companies?

    The reasons for company mergers and acquisitions include synergy, diversification, growth, improving competition, and supply ... Read Answer >>
Trading Center