Golden Parachute: Definition, Examples, Controversy

What Is a Golden Parachute?

A golden parachute consists of substantial benefits given to top executives if the company is taken over by another firm, and the executives are terminated as a result of the merger or takeover. Golden parachutes are contracts with key executives and can be used as a type of anti-takeover measure, often collectively referred to as poison pills, taken by a firm to discourage an unwanted takeover attempt. Benefits may include stock options, cash bonuses, and generous severance pay.

Golden parachutes are thus named as such because they are intended to provide a soft landing for employees of certain levels who lose their jobs.

Key Takeaways

  • Golden parachutes are lucrative severance packages inked into the contracts of top executives that compensate them when they are terminated.
  • In addition to large bonuses and stock compensation, golden parachutes may include ongoing insurance and pension benefits.
  • The practice is controversial as poorly performing or short-lived CEOs and other top executives can get paid large sums for little or poorly perceived work.

Click Play to Learn How Golden Parachutes Work

How Golden Parachutes Work

Golden parachute clauses can be used to define the lucrative benefits that an employee would receive if they are terminated. The term often relates to the terminations of top executives that result from a takeover or merger. ​​​​​​​Golden parachutes may include severance pay in the form of cash, a special bonus, stock options, or vesting of previously-awarded compensation. The employment contract contains explicit language detailing the conditions under which the silver parachute clause will become valid.

In addition to monetary awards, other examples of opulent parachute benefits include:

  • Continued enrollment in company pension plans
  • Vesting of all retirement benefits
  • Paid health and dental insurance
  • Compensation for legal fees

Instances of these and other exclusive advantages have drawn criticism from shareholders and the public. As a result, the post-financial crisis era has seen many companies review their executive-level compensation policies and devise new ways to link executive performance to corporate success. In many cases, their goal has been to determine whether such packages were in the best interests of the firm and its investors.

Controversy Surrounding Golden Parachutes

The use of golden parachutes is controversial. Supporters believe that golden parachutes make it easier to hire and retain top executives, particularly in merger-prone industries. In addition, proponents believe that these lucrative benefit packages allow executives to remain objective if the company is involved in a takeover or merger and that they can discourage takeovers because of the costs that are associated with the golden parachute contracts.

Opponents of golden parachutes argue that executives are already well-compensated and should not be rewarded for being terminated. Opponents may further argue that executives have an inherent fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interest of the company, and should not need an additional financial incentive to remain objective and act in the manner that best benefits the company. In addition, many people who disagree with golden parachutes argue that the associated costs are minuscule compared to the takeover costs and, as a result, can have little to no impact on the outcome of the takeover attempt.

Then there is the golden handshake. It is similar to a golden parachute in that it offers a severance package to an executive when they become unemployed. While both terms describe severance packages given to such an executive upon the termination of duties, a golden handshake goes further to include the severance packages granted to executives upon retirement, too.

Examples of Golden Parachutes

Some examples of golden parachutes that have been reported in the press include:

  • Meg Whitman, chief executive officer (CEO) of Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, stood to receive almost $91 million if the company was acquired under her control. She was also promised more than $51 million in compensation if she was terminated. She received a total of $35.6 million after the company was pared down.
  • Staples and Office Depot were exploring a merger until a federal court blocked it in May 2016. Had they merged, the CEO of Office Depot would have collected $39 million under the terms of his golden parachute.
  • Dell merged with storage giant EMC in 2016. Per the terms of his golden parachute, EMC's CEO received $27 million in compensation.
Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Bloomberg. "HPE’s Whitman Gets $35.6 Million in 2016 After Company Split." Accessed March 11, 2021.

  2. South Florida Sun Sentinel. "Office Depot CEO could walk with $39 million after merger." Accessed March 11, 2021.

  3. The Wall Street Journal. "Dell Closes $60 Billion Merger with EMC." Accessed March 11, 2021.

  4. Hartford Business Journal. "$27 million golden parachute for EMC CEO Joe Tucci." Accessed March 11, 2021.

Open a New Bank Account
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.