What is the 'Graham-Cassidy Healthcare Bill'

The Graham-Cassidy bill is a Republican effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA or "Obamacare") that would transfer much of the responsibility for structuring, funding and regulating of healthcare markets to the states. It was proposed by Senators Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in September 2017, following a number of failed attempts to roll back Obamacare from March to July. Although they planned to vote on the bill during the week of September 25, following an incomplete Congressional Budget Office (CBO) score, the vote did not happen. The decision not to vote on the Graham-Cassidy bill marked the fourth Obamacare repeal bill failure in 2017,  

The bill's full name is the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson bill; Dean Heller (R-Nev.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) are co-sponsors.

BREAKING DOWN 'Graham-Cassidy Healthcare Bill'

In early September 2017, Senators Cassidy and Graham began to solicit support for a bill that would roll back major provisions of Obamacare and shift control over health markets from the federal government to the states. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) indicated in a September 14 meeting that he would bring the bill to a vote if its sponsors could cobble together a majority.

The timeline was tight: The Senate parliamentarian had ruled that the ability to pass legislation using reconciliation would expire at the end of the month. Reconciliation allows Republicans, who control 52 seats in the Senate, to pass legislation with a simple majority (50 votes plus Vice President Mike Pence), rather than the 60 that would normally be needed to avert a Democratic filibuster. 

The bill needed to receive a CBO score showing that it would not raise the federal deficit over a ten-year period in order to qualify for the expedited process. The score was expected on or shortly after September 25, but would not include estimates of how many people will lose insurance coverage; these figures, which ranged from 16 to 32 million in 2026, played an important role in scuppering previous attempts to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Senators Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) – who cast the deciding vote against the Republican "skinny repeal" bill in July and is a close friend of Graham's – have said they would vote against the bill. Susan Collins (R-Maine) also voted "no," which left the Republicans one vote short.


The Graham-Cassidy bill would:

   • Repeal the individual mandate, which requires almost all Americans to obtain health insurance or pay tax penalties, without providing a replacement at the federal level. States would be free to devise their own substitutes or to revive the mandate at the state level. The mandate serves to keep insurance markets stable; without it, defenders of the provision warn, relatively young and healthy customers would choose to forgo insurance in order to save money on premiums. Since the remaining pool would be older and sicker, premiums would rise for all customers, pushing yet more of the relatively healthy to give up coverage. This vicious cycle, which can lead to the collapse of an insurance market, is known as a "death spiral."

   • Repeal the employer mandate, which penalizes businesses above a certain size that do not provide health insurance to employees.

   • Eliminate premium and cost-sharing subsidies in 2020. States would receive block grants, which they could use to fund subsidies if they chose. The Market-Based Health Care Grant Program, as the grants would be called, would receive $1.176 trillion over seven years. The bill does not mention any funding for subsidies after that year. Larry Levitt, Senior Vice President for Special Initiatives at the Kaiser Family Foundation, asks what effect this potential cliff-edge could have on funding decisions:

Avalere Health forecasts that all states would experience a net decline in funding from 2020 to 2036, with the average cut exceeding 30%. Nationwide the cut would amount to almost $4.2 trillion.

   • Allow states to modify community rating, which prohibits insurers from denying coverage or charging more based on pre-existing conditions. Insurers would still not be able to refuse coverage based on health status, but they could decline to cover some costs associated with pre-existing conditions. States would also be able to change the definition of essential health benefits, 10 conditions that insurers are required to cover under the ACA. 

   • Allow insurers to charge older customers five times what they do younger ones – up from a ratio of three under current law.

   • Increase maximum Health Savings Account (HSA) contributions and allow patients to use HSAs to pay for over-the-counter drugs.

   • Devote $155 billion to a reinsurance fund for insurers that suffer losses, which would be available from 2018 to 2020.

   • Fund Medicaid through per capita grants beginning in 2020, with the option to receive the funds as block grants. In 2025 spending growth per non-elderly enrollee would be linked to overall inflation, which increases at a slower rate than medical inflation. The Market-Based Health Care Grant Program, which replaces subsidies, would also replace Medicaid expansion funding. States would have the option to impose work requirements for some Medicaid recipients.

   • Repeal the medical device excise tax and delay the implementation of the "Cadillac tax" on high-cost plans until 2026.

   • Block Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood for one year. Medicaid is already bound by the Hyde amendment, which prohibits the program from paying for abortions (except in cases of rape and incest), so the funding cuts would affect other services such as cancer screening and STD testing and prevention.

   • Apply the Hyde amendment to federal health grants to states, prohibiting these funds from paying for abortions except in cases of rape or incest. The Senate parliamentarian may strike this provision from the bill on the basis that it does not directly relate to the budget (a requirement for passing the bill under reconciliation). Even so, the Graham-Cassidy bill would provide grants to states through the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which is bound by the Hyde amendment, beginning in 2021. The abortion restrictions would still come into effect, albeit with a delay.

  1. Trumponomics

    Trumponomics is a term for the economic policies of President ...
  2. Affordable Care Act

    A federal statute signed into law in March 2010 as a part of ...
  3. Health Insurance

    Health insurance is a type of insurance coverage that pays for ...
  4. U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ...

    The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) administers ...
  5. Universal Health Care Coverage

    Universal health care coverage are systems in which all legal ...
  6. Senate Bill

    A piece of proposed legislation that either originated or was ...
Related Articles
  1. Insurance

    What If Obamacare Is Repealed?

    During the campaign, Donald Trump promised to repeal Obamacare. If, as president, he follows through, how will that affect Americans?
  2. Insights

    Trumpcare Is Dead: 'Obamacare Is the Law of the Land'

    Lacking support from the right wing and centrists, the Republicans have failed in their 63rd attempt to end Obamacare.
  3. Taxes

    10 States with Highest Income Taxes

    Find out who is actually paying the most state taxes as a percent of their income. California and New Jersey are not in the top 10.
  4. Insurance

    What Happens if Obamacare Is Repealed?

    The repercussions of de-funding the Affordable Care Act will be significant.
  5. Trading

    Short Sellers Take Aim at Vulnerable Health Carriers

    Health carrier stocks could enter steep bear markets if the latest Obamacare repeal bill becomes law.
  6. Insights

    The Evolution of Obamacare Since Its Inception

    Find out whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, has lived up to its lofty projections from 2010.
  7. Investing

    REITs to Suffer on Senate Plans to Repeal Obamacare (HCP)

    The Senate has made the first key step in repealing Obamacare, and health care REITs may be one of many firms to suffer.
  8. Investing

    Top Fund Managers Bet Against Trump Replacing Obamacare

    Several top fund managers opine that Trump will not make any big changes to Obamacare.
  9. Taxes

    Trump Signs Tax Reform Bill

    The president signed the GOP's overhaul of the federal tax code into law.
  10. Insights

    Goldman Sachs Concludes Obamacare Added 500k Jobs

    A recent study by Goldman Sachs is part of a growing body of research suggesting Obamacare has actually been good for the U.S. job market.
Hot Definitions
  1. Price-Earnings Ratio - P/E Ratio

    The Price-to-Earnings Ratio or P/E ratio is a ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative ...
  2. Internal Rate of Return - IRR

    Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is a metric used in capital budgeting to estimate the profitability of potential investments.
  3. Limit Order

    An order placed with a brokerage to buy or sell a set number of shares at a specified price or better.
  4. Current Ratio

    The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company's ability to pay short-term and long-term obligations.
  5. Return on Investment (ROI)

    Return on Investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or compare the efficiency ...
  6. Interest Coverage Ratio

    The interest coverage ratio is a debt ratio and profitability ratio used to determine how easily a company can pay interest ...
Trading Center