Gypsy Swap

Gypsy Swap

Investopedia / Michela Buttignol

What Is a Gypsy Swap?

The term "gypsy swap," though an established term, is problematic because of its racist overtones with respect to the Romani people. The term describes a method by which a company may raise capital without issuing additional debt or holding a secondary public offering. In some ways, this type of swap is similar to a rights offering, but in this case, the restricted party's equity claim does not lapse, and the swap is instantly dilutive.

Key Takeaways:

  • A "gypsy swap" is a now somewhat offensive term because of its racial undertones.
  • The term describes a way for a company to raise capital without issuing additional debt or holding a secondary public offering.
  • Gypsy swaps involve multiple transactions.
  • In many cases, gypsy swaps are considered last-ditch efforts to raise cash and avoid cash constraints or bank covenants.

Understanding a Gypsy Swap

Gypsy swaps are composed of multiple transactions with the ultimate goal of increasing capital for the business. By convincing existing shareholders to trade in common shares for restricted shares, the business can then sell the common shares to new investors, thus increasing capital. In many cases, gypsy swaps are considered last-ditch efforts to avoid cash constraints or bank covenants by engaging in some "creative" capital-raising.

While gypsy swaps appear to be a roundabout way of creating capital, the act typically results in the company having to sweeten the pot for both new and existing shareholders for them to accept the terms of the deal. This means that the company would probably be better off raising capital through traditional channels, if possible, since it would be cheaper and easier.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will sometimes consider a gypsy swap as a way to circumvent regulations. For instance, Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act spell out that you cannot sell or offer to sell any security without registering the security in advance or receiving a waiver. The SEC has taken a firm stance with regard to Section 5, violations, and gypsy swaps. In the legal case of Zacharias v. SEC, the Court agreed with the SEC's position that both the original shareholder and the purchaser were participants in the transaction and upheld a disgorgement penalty of 100% of the proceeds of the sale.

How a Gypsy Swap Works

The gypsy swap involves two main transactions. First, a group of existing shareholders is convinced to exchange common stock for restricted shares from the issuing company so that the company receives the common shares to their treasury. In monetary terms, these shareholders break even; they do not gain or lose from the transaction itself, although there may be some tax consequences depending on the situation.

Second, the company sells the common stock that they've received to new investors at a price that may be higher or lower than the current market price, receiving cash in return. The company successfully raised additional capital and the new investors become equity holders in the issuing company while the first set of investors maintains a position in the restricted stock.

A gypsy swap is seen as a last-ditch financing option because the new investors almost always demand some combination of below-market value price or special consideration from the deal. In fact, if the issuing company could raise funding conventionally—internally from the equity markets or the debt markets—it certainly would choose to do so.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Responses to Frequently Asked Questions about a Broker-Dealer's Duties When Relying on the Securities Act Section 4(a)(4) Exemption to Execute Customer Orders." Accessed Nov. 13, 2020.

  2. U.S. Court of Appeals. "Christopher H. Zacharias, Petitioner V. Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent," Page 18. Accessed Nov. 13, 2020.

Open a New Bank Account
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.