An industrial bank is a state-chartered, financial institution, usually owned by a commercial firm, that is not regulated by a federal banking agency. Industrial banks accept customer deposits and provide loans for consumers and small businesses.
Industrial banks are also known as industrial loan companies (ILCs). Industrial banks are only chartered by a few states; the state of Utah provides the majority of charters for industrial banks in the U.S.
- An industrial bank–also referred to as an industrial loan company (ILC)–is a state-chartered, financial institution, usually owned by a commercial firm, that is not regulated by a federal banking agency.
- Industrial banks are only chartered by a few states; the state of Utah provides the majority of charters for industrial banks in the U.S.
- Industrial banks have become controversial because they allow nonfinancial companies to offer banking services without oversight by the Federal Reserve.
Understanding Industrial Banks
Industrial banks were originally founded in the early 1900s in order to provide low-to-moderate-income industrial workers who were unable to qualify for credit at traditional lending institutions with a means to access capital.
Industrial banks are regulated by state regulators and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC). Because of their distinct corporate structure, industrial banks can be owned by companies. They are not subject to some of the regulations that govern traditional institutions and do not have to comply with the Bank Holding Company Act. In addition, industrial banks do not face supervision by the Federal Reserve. As a result of this lack of regulatory restrictions, many financial technology companies and investment companies have started to apply for industrial bank charters.
While industrial banks have limited banking powers nationwide, they generally maintain the same powers and privileges as a traditional commercial bank. Industrial banks are controversial amongst those who support a more stalwart division between banks and commercial firms. Criticisms of industrial banks claim that they provide companies with the privileges, but not the supervision, of a bank charter.
Criticism of Industrial Banks
In 2005, Wal-Mart Inc. filed an application to form a new industrial bank for the purpose of reducing credit and debit card transaction fees. This triggered widespread opposition and protests from commercial banks and financial regulators. The FDIC eventually placed a temporary moratorium on industrial bank applications in 2006. At the same time, state-level legislation was passed that would block any prospective industrial banks from opening branches in different jurisdictions.
Wal-Mart Inc. withdrew its application in 2007 before the FDIC could make any decision regarding the status of their application. Opponents of Wal-Mart’s application claimed that the company's engagement in the business of banking posed a threat to the banking system and to the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund.
In early 2019, lobbyists from the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) distributed a policy paper that called for a moratorium on providing federal deposit insurance to industrial banks. Their actions were motivated by a new wave of fintech companies, including payment processor Square Inc., that have submitted applications for state bank charters. A bank charter would allow Square Inc. to provide loans and other financial services directly to its merchants. However, ICBA claims that industrial bank charters are a loophole that Congress needs to address. Not only would fintech companies who receive bank charters be exempt from supervision by the Federal Reserve, but they also wouldn't be required to disclose any nonbanking-related commercial activities.
In November 2019, Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana introduced a bill, called the "Eliminating Corporate Shadow Banking Act of 2019," that would effectively end the ability of nonfinancial companies to form industrial banks. The ICBA has expressed its support for Sen. Kennedy's bill, claiming that it would close the loophole of industrial banks, create a safer financial system, and help maintain the separation of banking and commerce.