Misery Index: Definition, Components, History, and Limitations

What Is the Misery Index?

The misery index is meant to measure the degree of economic distress felt by everyday people, due to the risk of (or actual) joblessness combined with an increasing cost of living. The misery index is calculated by adding the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate to the inflation rate.

Since unemployment and inflation are both considered detrimental to one's economic well-being, their combined value is useful as an indicator of overall economic health. The original misery index was popularized in the 1970s with the development of stagflation, or simultaneously high inflation and unemployment.

Key Takeaways

  • The first misery index was created by Arthur Okun and was equal to the sum of inflation and unemployment rate figures to provide a snapshot of the U.S. economy.
  • The higher the index, the greater the misery felt by average citizens.
  • It has broadened in recent times to include other economic indicators, such as bank lending rates.
  • The misery index is considered a convenient but imprecise metric. There are several circumstances where it may not be accurately representative of economic distress.
  • In recent times, variations of the original misery index have become popular as a means to gauge the overall health of a national economy.

Click Play to Learn What the Misery Index Is

Understanding the Misery Index

The misery index has two components: unemployment and inflation. Unemployment, as measured in the U.S., is the number of able-bodied adults who are actively looking for work, as a fraction of the total workforce. Inflation refers to the rate at which money loses buying power, due to the rise of consumer prices. In most cases, these numbers are inversely correlated: when more people are employed, prices tend to rise, and vice versa.

The misery index is calculated by adding both components: the seasonally adjusted rate of unemployment and the annual inflation rate.

Misery index = Seasonally Adjusted Rate of Unemployment + Annual Inflation Rate

Economists generally consider "full employment" to mean an unemployment rate of 4%–5%, and the Federal Reserve (Fed) targets an inflation rate of 2%. Therefore, a satisfactory misery index rating would be in the range of 6%–7%.

Components of the Misery Index

Seasonally Adjusted Rate of Unemployment 

The unemployment rate is adjusted seasonally to remove the seasonal patterns that may arise and thus provide a good insight into the relative level of employment.

The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate is measured as a percentage, and it reflects the total labor workforce who can work and seek employment actively but can’t find any job. Workers who are retired but working and those who have quit their efforts to find a job are excluded from the seasonally adjusted rate.

The percentage is reported monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the U.S. in their report.

Annual Inflation Rate

The annual inflation rate is the percentage increase in the price of the goods and the services consumed by the buyers. In short, it measures the costs of any goods and services existing in the economy.

The consumer price index (CPI) report, released monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, contains any data related to the economy's inflation.

Current Misery Index as of July 2022

Current Misery Index = 12.02

Unemployment rate (3.5) + Inflation rate (8.52)

History of the Misery Index

  • Arthur Okun's Concept: The first misery index was created by economist Arthur Okun, using the simple sum of the nation’s annual inflation and unemployment rates to provide an easily understood snapshot of the economy’s relative health. The higher the index, the greater the misery felt by the average citizen.
  • Period of stagflation: During the 1970s, after President Nixon restricted and then severed the final links between the U.S. dollar and gold, the U.S. experienced several years of simultaneously elevated price inflation and unemployment, known as stagflation. The American people were caught in a squeeze between the hardships of joblessness as the economy hit a series of recessions and a rising cost of living as the dollar rapidly lost value. This phenomenon did not fit with dominant macroeconomic theories at the time, based on the Phillips curve, which led economists to explore alternative ideas to describe and explain what was going on, including Okun's misery index. At the time the misery index was novel because mainstream economists had previously believed that inflation and unemployment would tend to offset one another and should not both rise at the same time.
  • Use in presidential campaigns: During the 1976 campaign for U.S. president, candidate Jimmy Carter popularized Okun’s misery index as a means of criticizing his opponent, incumbent Gerald Ford. By the end of Ford’s administration, the misery index was a relatively high 12.7%, creating a tempting target for Carter. During the 1980 presidential campaign, Ronald Reagan in turn pointed out that the misery index had increased under Carter.

Limitations of the Misery Index

While it is a convenient shorthand for economic misfortune, there are several reasons why the misery index should not be considered a precise metric for economic health.

For one thing, both components of the misery index have inherent blind spots. The unemployment rate only counts the unemployed who are actively looking for work; it does include those who have given up looking for work, as might be the case for long-term stretches of unemployment.

Likewise, low inflation can also be accompanied by unexpected misery. No inflation, or even deflation, can be signs of a stagnant economy, but they would produce a very low misery index.

In addition, the misery index treats unemployment and inflation equally. However, a 1% increase in unemployment likely causes more misery than a 1% increase in inflation would.


The Okun misery index is considered a convenient but highly imprecise metric, due to the inherent blindspots of both inflation and unemployment as measurements of economic health.

Criticisms of the Misery Index

The Okun misery index has faced some criticism from economists.

  • It doesn't include some key factors. Some believe it is not a good indicator of economic performance because it doesn't include economic growth data. This mistakes the intent of the misery index as a measure of general economic performance rather than as a measure of the pain felt by the average citizen. Regardless, it is smart for investors to build an emergency fund in case of an economic downturn or job loss.
  • It only considers current data. As a measure of personal economic distress, the misery index may underweight the role of expectations and uncertainty by looking only at current unemployment and inflation rates—when much of the stress and worry that people actually feel is for their future economic prospects (in addition to current conditions). In particular, the unemployment rate is generally considered to be a lagging indicator that likely understates perceived misery early in a recession and overstates it even after the recession is over.
  • It's used inconsistently. During the Great Moderation, the prevalence of low unemployment and low inflation figures across much of the world also meant that the misery index was seldom used except during brief recessions and crises from time to time. Bad news sells, so periods of simultaneously low inflation and unemployment simply don't generate the same impetus to measure and track economic misery.

There have been several attempts to modernize the misery index by including other metrics.

Newer Versions of the Misery Index

The misery index has been modified several times, first by Harvard economist Robert Barro. In 1999, Barro created the Barro misery index, which adds consumer lending interest rates and the gap between actual and potential gross domestic product (GDP) growth to evaluate post-WWII presidents.

In 2011, Johns Hopkins economist Steve Hanke modified Barro's misery index and broadened its application to be a cross-country index. Hanke's annual misery index is the sum of unemployment, inflation, and bank lending rates, minus the change in real GDP per capita.

Hanke publishes his global list of misery index rankings annually for the countries that report relevant data on a timely basis. In 2020, his list included 156 nations, with Guyana being identified as the world’s happiest country and Venezuela as the world's most miserable country.

The concept of a misery index has also been expanded to asset classes. For example, Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat Advisors, created the Bitcoin Misery Index (BMI) to measure the average bitcoin investor's misery. The index calculates the percentage of winning trades against total trades and adds it to the cryptocurrency's overall volatility. The index is considered "at misery" when its total value is less than 27.

A variation of the original misery index is the Bloomberg misery index. Argentina, South Africa, and Venezuela, countries beset by widespread inflation and unemployment, topped the index in 2020.

On the other end, Thailand, Singapore, and Japan were considered the happiest countries according to economist estimates. But low inflation and low unemployment rates can also mask low demand, as the publication itself pointed out. Japan is a textbook case of persistently low demand due to an economy that has been in stagflation for the last two decades.

Misery Index Under Different Presidents

Although the misery index was first popularized in the 1970s, it is possible to evaluate the economic misfortunes under different presidents by comparing their inflation and unemployment figures. Unsurprisingly, the most miserable year on record was during the Great Depression; the misery index reached 25.7% in the first year of Franklin Roosevelt's presidency. The index fell to 3.5% by 1944, likely due to the full employment during the Second World War.

Richard Nixon (1969–1974) and Jimmy Carter (1977–1981) have the unenviable distinction of presiding over the most miserable economies of the post-war period, with the misery index reaching 20% under Nixon and 22% under Carter. Misery fell sharply under Ronald Reagan, and it continued to trend downwards during the Bush and Clinton presidencies.

During the presidency of George W. Bush, the misery index again trended upwards, reaching a peak of 12.7% under President Obama due to the ongoing Great Recession. The index fell to a low of 5.06% by 2015 and remained low through most of the Trump presidency (2016–2020). However, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a sharp increase in unemployment, causing the misery index to reach 15%.

What Is the Current Misery Index?

The Misery Index as of July 2022 is 12.02 (Unemployment rate of 3.5 + Inflation rate of 8.52).

Who Created the Misery Index?

The Misery Index was created originally by economist Arthur Okun in the 1960s and it was initially called the Economic Discomfort Index.

What's the Most Miserable Country in the World?

As of 2021 and according to the Misery Index, Cuba was the most miserable country in the world with a misery index score of 1,227.6, followed by Venezuela (index score of 774.3) and Sudan (397.2).

The Bottom Line

The misery index, created by economist Arthur Okun, is an economic indicator that is calculated by adding the seasonally adjusted rate of unemployment and the annual inflation rate. Broadly speaking, it serves as a measure of a nation's economic health and helps determine how the average citizen is doing economically.

While the misery index became a popular measure due to its simplicity, it is widely regarded as an ineffective measure of macroeconomic conditions since it doesn't consider economic growth data.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. U.S. Misery Index. "United States Misery Index - How miserable do you feel?"

  2. Brookings Institution. "The Brookings Institution’s Arthur Okun – Father of the 'Misery Index'."

  3. Bloomberg. "Reagan Vs. Clinton: Who's The Economic Champ?"

  4. Cato Institute. "Hanke’s Annual Misery Index: the World’s Saddest (And Happiest) Countries."

  5. Cato Institute. "Hanke’s 2020 Misery Index: Who’s Miserable and Who’s Happy?"

  6. FSInsight. "Bitcoin Misery Index BMI."

  7. Bloomberg. "U.S. Worse Off Than Russia, Mexico in 2020 Economic Misery Ranking."

  8. InflationData.com "Misery Index."

  9. Statista. "Misery index scores for the most miserable countries in the world 2021."

Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.