What is 'Rate Of Return Regulation'

Rate of return regulation is a form of price setting regulation where governments determine the fair price which is allowed to be charged by a monopoly. It is meant to protect customers from being charged higher prices due to the monopoly's power while still allowing the monopoly to cover its costs and earn a fair return for its owners.

BREAKING DOWN 'Rate Of Return Regulation'

Rate of return regulation was used most often in the United States to price goods and services offered by utility companies, like gas, television cable, water, telephone service and electricity. A history of antitrust sentiment and antitrust regulation led to the implementation of rate of return regulation in the U.S., which was upheld by the 1877 Supreme Court case Munn v. Illinois and further developed through a series of cases beginning with Smyth v. Ames in 1898.

Rate of return regulation allowed customers to feel that they were getting a fair price for essential services while allowing investors to feel that they were getting a fair return on their investments in these industries. Rate of return regulation remained common in the U.S. through much of the 20th century, gradually being replaced by other, more efficient methods, such as price-gap regulation and revenue-cap regulation.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Rate of Return Regulation

Customers benefit from prices that are reasonable, given the monopolist's operating costs. It offers long-term rate sustainability, as it provides some resistance for rates against the popularity of a company among investors and against changes that might take place within that company. It provides stability in monopolized industries, while preventing monopolies from making large profits with price-gouging. Investors, while they will not make huge dividends, will benefit from substantial and consistent returns. Customers do not feel as if they are being overcharged for essential services, and the monopoly in question benefits from a stable public image as a result.

Rate of return regulation is often criticized because it provides little incentive to reduce costs and increase efficiency. A monopolist who is regulated in this manner does not earn more if costs are reduced. Thus, customers may still be charged higher prices than they would be under free competition. Rate of return regulation can contribute to the Averch-Johnson effect, whereby firms thus regulated accumulate capital and allow it to depreciate in order to subvert the system and obtain governmental permission to raise rates.

RELATED TERMS
  1. Natural Monopoly

    A natural monopoly is the domination of an industry or sector ...
  2. Monopoly

    A monopoly is a situation in which one corporation, firm or entity ...
  3. Monopolist

    A monopolist is an individual, group or company that controls ...
  4. Franchised Monopoly

    A franchised monopoly is a company sheltered from competition ...
  5. Regulatory Capture

    Regulatory capture is a theory that regulatory agencies may come ...
  6. Buyer's Monopoly

    A buyer's monopoly, or monopsony, is a market situation where ...
Related Articles
  1. Insights

    How and Why Companies Become Monopolies

    Without competition, monopolies can raise prices and lower quality, leaving consumers little choice. But monopolies can benefit consumers as well.
  2. Insights

    A History Of U.S. Monopolies

    These monoliths helped develop the economy and infrastructure at the expense of competition.
  3. Insights

    The Cost of Free Markets

    Some argue that when the free market fails to protect consumers, government regulation is required.
  4. Investing

    5 Lessons in finance and investing from Monopoly

    The classic real estate game of Monopoly can increase your chances of having a better understanding of prudent financial and investment principles.
  5. Insights

    Financial Regulations: Glass-Steagall to Dodd-Frank

    Here are some of the most important financial regulations that have been established.
  6. Investing

    The Party for Bank Stocks May Be Over

    While bank stocks surged following the election, these securities declined recently.
  7. Investing

    Do Tech Stocks Face a Heavily Regulated Future?

    Technology could see things change as new regulations respond to a wave of data scandals.
  8. Trading

    Navigating U.S. Regulations for Forex Brokers

    Forex is, understandably, tightly regulated. We navigate the forex regulations in the United States and other countries.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What impact does government regulation have on the financial services sector?

    Learn about how the financial services industry is affected by government regulation, and the different types of regulations ... Read Answer >>
  2. Are monopolies always bad?

    Learn why governments sanction some monopolies, such as monopolies over public utilities, and why these monopolies are good ... Read Answer >>
  3. What are Common Examples of Monopolistic Markets?

    Many utilities are monopolistic markets. A monopoly exists when one firm can operate at a lower marginal cost than its competitors. Read Answer >>
  4. How does a monopoly contribute to market failure?

    Read a simple overview of the theory of market monopoly, where it originated and some contemporary challenges to the classical ... Read Answer >>
  5. What Are the Major Differences Between a Monopoly and an Oligopoly?

    Learn about the major differences between a monopoly and an oligopoly. Find answers to some common questions surrounding ... Read Answer >>
Trading Center