What is 'Rate Of Return Regulation'

Rate of return regulation is a form of price setting regulation where governments determine the fair price which is allowed to be charged by a monopoly. It is meant to protect customers from being charged higher prices due to the monopoly's power while still allowing the monopoly to cover its costs and earn a fair return for its owners.

BREAKING DOWN 'Rate Of Return Regulation'

Rate of return regulation was used most often in the United States to price goods and services offered by utility companies, like gas, television cable, water, telephone service and electricity. A history of antitrust sentiment and antitrust regulation led to the implementation of rate of return regulation in the U.S., which was upheld by the 1877 Supreme Court case Munn v. Illinois and further developed through a series of cases beginning with Smyth v. Ames in 1898.

Rate of return regulation allowed customers to feel that they were getting a fair price for essential services while allowing investors to feel that they were getting a fair return on their investments in these industries. Rate of return regulation remained common in the U.S. through much of the 20th century, gradually being replaced by other, more efficient methods, such as price-gap regulation and revenue-cap regulation.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Rate of Return Regulation

Customers benefit from prices that are reasonable, given the monopolist's operating costs. It offers long-term rate sustainability, as it provides some resistance for rates against the popularity of a company among investors and against changes that might take place within that company. It provides stability in monopolized industries, while preventing monopolies from making large profits with price-gouging. Investors, while they will not make huge dividends, will benefit from substantial and consistent returns. Customers do not feel as if they are being overcharged for essential services, and the monopoly in question benefits from a stable public image as a result.

Rate of return regulation is often criticized because it provides little incentive to reduce costs and increase efficiency. A monopolist who is regulated in this manner does not earn more if costs are reduced. Thus, customers may still be charged higher prices than they would be under free competition. Rate of return regulation can contribute to the Averch-Johnson effect, whereby firms thus regulated accumulate capital and allow it to depreciate in order to subvert the system and obtain governmental permission to raise rates.

RELATED TERMS
  1. Natural Monopoly

    A natural monopoly is the domination of an industry or sector ...
  2. Legal Monopoly

    A legal monopoly is a company that is operating as a monopoly ...
  3. Franchised Monopoly

    A franchised monopoly is a company sheltered from competition ...
  4. Price Maker

    A price maker is an entity with a monopoly that has the power ...
  5. Regulated Market

    A regulated market is a market over which government bodies or, ...
  6. Monopolistic Market

    A monopolistic market is typically dominated by one supplier ...
Related Articles
  1. Insights

    The Pitfalls Of Financial Regulation

    Regulatory actions usually have lofty intentions that end up with unintended and negative consequences.
  2. Investing

    New Monopoly Edition Ditches Paper Money (HAS)

    Hasbro's latest version of Monopoly speeds up the classic game and reflects our movement towards a cashless society. It will still probably end friendships over the "free parking" rule, though.
  3. Investing

    Monopoly-Like Companies

    We might not have monopolies, but some businesses operate in industries where a couple of businesses essentially dominate.
  4. Investing

    Fidelity Investments: Tech Stocks Should Be Okay Over Long Haul

    Despite prospects of more regulation for tech companies, Fidelity Investments fund manager Nidhi Gupta thinks the sector will be okay.
  5. Insights

    A Short History of the US Federal Trade Commission

    Since the early 1900s, the Federal Trade Commission has preventing anticompetitive, deceptive, and unfair business practices.
  6. Insights

    Government Regulations: Do They Help Businesses?

    These rules are in place to protect consumers and help businesses thrive at the same time.
  7. Insights

    Financial Regulations: Glass-Steagall to Dodd-Frank

    Here are some of the most important financial regulations that have been established.
  8. Personal Finance

    Why Donald Trump Should Kill the Fiduciary Rule

    An argument for why the Trump administration should repeal the fiduciary rule.
  9. Investing

    Do Tech Stocks Face a Heavily Regulated Future?

    Technology could see things change as new regulations respond to a wave of data scandals.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What are Common Examples of Monopolistic Markets?

    Providers of water, natural gas, telecommunications, and electricity have all been historically monopolistic markets. A monopoly ... Read Answer >>
  2. How strongly does government regulation impact the utilities sector?

    Read about the impact of government regulation on the utilities sector, particularly as is pertains to the water and electricity ... Read Answer >>
  3. Are there any legal monopolies in America or Europe?

    Legal monopolies continue to exist in the United States and Europe despite the current trend against their recognition and ... Read Answer >>
  4. Who regulates mortgage lenders?

    The Federal Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) dictate most of the regulations mortgage ... Read Answer >>
  5. What types of regulations are in place regarding fringe benefits?

    Read about the types of regulations that impact employee fringe benefits in the United States, including benefits mandated ... Read Answer >>
Trading Center