Loading the player...

What is 'Related-Party Transaction'

A related-party transaction is a business deal or arrangement between two parties who are joined by a preexisting special relationship. For example, a business transaction between a major shareholder and a corporation, such as a contract for the shareholder's company to perform renovations to the corporation's offices, would be deemed a related-party transaction.

BREAKING DOWN 'Related-Party Transaction'

Related-party transactions are common in business. For example, companies often seek to secure business deals with parties with whom they are familiar or have a common interest. While these types of transactions are legal, the special relationship inherent between the involved parties creates potential conflicts of interest. However, regulations exist to prevent an unfair advantage granted to related parties.

A number of regulatory procedures are in place to ensure that related-party transactions are conflict-free and do not negatively affect value for shareholders. American public companies are required to disclose all transactions with related parties, such as executives, associates, and family members in their annual 10-K reports. As a result of this added reporting requirement, many companies have special policies and corporate compliance procedures to ensure that related-party transactions are appropriately documented and enacted.

Related Parties

Related parties and business services can take many different forms. Some of the most common types of related parties include business affiliates, shareholder groups, subsidiaries, and minority-owned companies. Related party transactions can include sales, leases, service agreements, and loan agreements.

In large corporate situations, public companies are often minority or majority-owned by other entities. These entities may have similar business interests due to business commonalities. In these cases, related-party transactions may naturally occur, such as vendor or supplier relationships for the mutual benefit of both companies.

Accounting and Auditing Standards

The management of policies and procedures that track related-party transactions and business deals include a number of factors. These factors are regulated by the industry’s accounting and audit standards, and in many cases, these special transactions must be approved by management consensus or the company’s board of directors. Some specific standards and procedures set for related-party transactions include the monitoring of payment competitiveness, payment terms, monetary transactions, and authorized expenses. Overall, all related-party transactions must be transparently reported to ensure that all actions are legal and ethical and do not harm shareholder value.

Although there are rules and standards for related-party transactions, they are difficult to audit.  The transactions are not always easily identifiable and the disclosure of related parties is the responsibility of the owners and management, who may choose to withhold disclosure for personal gain.  If owners or managers do not disclose related parties and their interests, the transactions can go undetected.  Transactions with related-parties may be hidden among similar normal transactions, making it difficult to distinguish.  Hidden transactions and undisclosed relationships could lead to improperly inflated earnings and fraud.  Also, a company's internal control systems may not be sophisticated enough to properly track these transactions.  

Examples

One example of fraudulent use of related-party transactions include the infamous Enron scandal, in which related-party transactions with "special-purpose entities" were used to help conceal billions of dollars in debt from failed business ventures and investments.  The related-parties misled the board of directors, their audit committee, employees, and the public.  The fraudulent related-party transactions led to the bankruptcy of Enron, prison sentences for its executives, lost pensions and savings of employees and shareholders, and the ruin and closure of Arthur Andersen, Enron's auditor, which was found guilty of federal crimes and SEC violations.  Misuse of related-party relationships affects more than the direct parties involved as seen with Enron. Out of this disaster was birthed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which established new and expanded existing requirements for United States public company boards, management, and public accounting firms, including rules that limit conflicts of interest arising from related-party transactions.

RELATED TERMS
  1. Five Percent Rule

    The five percent rule requires brokers to use fair and ethical ...
  2. Transaction Date

    A transaction date in the date upon which a trade takes place ...
  3. Arm's Length Transaction

    Arm's length transaction is a transaction where the buyer and ...
  4. Agency Cross

    An agency cross is a transaction in which an investment adviser ...
  5. Credit Card Posting

    Credit card posting occurs when a cardholder transaction has ...
  6. Comparable Transaction

    A comparable transaction is a method of valuing a company that ...
Related Articles
  1. Managing Wealth

    Putting Management Under The Microscope

    We tell you where to find the telltale signs of corporate misdeeds.
  2. Insights

    Detecting Financial Statement Fraud

    Find out how to tell if a company is manipulating its financial data, so you don't invest in the next Enron.
  3. Tech

    Bitcoin Transactions Vs. Credit Card Transactions

    We provide an overview of the differences between bitcoin and credit card transactions, and the advantages of using one over the other.
  4. Investing

    Arm's Length Transaction

    An arm’s length transaction describes business deals in which the buyer and seller act independently and with no interest in the other’s benefit.
  5. Tech

    How Will Lightning Network Evolve In The Future?

    Here are three ways in which Lightning Network, one of the solutions being proposed to scale bitcoin's blockchain, is evolving to solve its problems.
  6. Tech

    Why Do A High Percentage Of Crypto Transactions Have No Economic Value?

    A high percentage of cryptocurrency transactions have no economic value, according to recent research.
  7. Tech

    How Much Cheaper are Bitcoin Fees than Credit Card Fees?

    Bitcoin transaction fees are starting to rise as the network gets backlogged due to more usage, but are still much lower than typical credit card fees.
  8. Trading

    Principal trading and agency trading

    Ever wonder what happens behind the scenes when you buy or sell a stock? Read on to find out.
  9. Insights

    Countries With The Best And Worst Investor Protection

    Discover which countries do the most to protect the little guy from scheming executives and shady back-room deals.
  10. Tech

    Will Rising Transaction Fees Bring Down Bitcoin's Price?

    Bitcoin's escalating transaction fees have raised eyebrows but experts say they won't hurt bitcoin's price.
RELATED FAQS
  1. Who is Responsible for Shareholders Interests?

    Several parties are supposed to be responsible for protecting and managing shareholders' interests, including the company's ... Read Answer >>
  2. What are some examples of inherent risk?

    Here, we define the nature of inherent risk in preparing and executing financial audits and explain its prevalence in the ... Read Answer >>
  3. How do you make working capital adjustments in transfer pricing?

    Understand how working capital adjustments are applicable to transfer pricing. Learn about the arm's length standard and ... Read Answer >>
  4. What do T+1, T+2 and T+3 mean?

    For security transactions, T+1, T+2, and T+3 refer to settlement dates which occur on a transaction date plus one, two and ... Read Answer >>
Trading Center