What Is a Restrictive Covenant?
A restrictive covenant, also known as a negative covenant, is any type of agreement in a contract or obligation that either restricts the buyer from taking some action or requires that they abstain from a specific action. In bond obligations (debentures), restrictive covenants disallow issuers from activities such as taking on new debt or other corporate actions.
In real estate transactions, restrictive covenants are binding legal obligations written into the deed of a property contract, usually by the seller. These covenants can be either simple or complex and can levy penalties against buyers who fail to obey them.
A restrictive covenant may be contrasted with a positive covenant, which is a clause in an agreement that requires parties to take certain actions. rather than preventing actions.
- Restrictive covenants require a real estate buyer to either take or abstain from specific actions.
- They can pertain to everything from what colors you can paint your house to what kind of roof you may put on it to how many tenants may live in a building.
- Buyers who fail to meet restrictive covenants can incur penalties.
- Sometimes restrictive covenants can be removed via payments to sellers, who must report such payments as capital gains income.
Understanding Restrictive Covenants
A restrictive covenant is an agreement that restricts a company or other party to a contract from engaging in certain actions. For example, a restrictive covenant entered into with a public company might limit the amount of dividends the firm can pay its shareholders. It could also place a cap on executives’ salaries. A negative covenant may be found in employment agreements and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) contracts. However, these covenants are almost always found in loan or bond documents.
Common restrictions placed on borrowers through negative covenants include preventing a bond issuer from issuing more debt until one or more series of bonds have matured. Also, a borrowing firm may be restricted from paying dividends over a certain amount to shareholders so as not to increase the default risk to bondholders, since the more money paid to shareholders the less available funds will be to make interest and principal payment obligations to lenders.
Generally, the more negative covenants exist in a bond issue, the lower the interest rate on the debt will be since the restrictive covenants make the bonds safer in the eyes of investors.
Restrictive covenants can also apply to real estate deals, where they include such reasonable provisions as not allowing pets or renovations without approval from the neighbors or community association. They can also place more-onerous restrictions on buyers, such as the number of tenants who can live in a property or even the timing of holiday decoration setup and removal. These covenants are particularly prevalent in planned communities with homeowner’s associations. Payments received for the release of restrictive covenants of investment properties are treated as capital gains.
Examples of Restrictive Covenants in Real Estate
Restrictive covenants on a property can govern how it is used by the occupants. For example, a restrictive covenant on a residential property might bar any business activities from being conducted on the property. This could preclude the occupant from running a home-based business or having a home office on the premises.
Architectural guidelines set in restrictive covenants may limit renovation plans for the property. The buyer of the property may be required to maintain its original appearance or to keep the property in a certain color scheme or style that is comparable to neighboring properties.
For example, a property in a certain area or neighborhood may be under restrictive covenants to adhere to a specific type of roofing code and exterior color to maintain aesthetic consistency in the neighborhood. Property owners could be barred from placing commercial signs or signs of any type on the premises, and flagpoles on the property may be limited to a certain height.
History of Restrictive Housing Covenants
Restrictive covenants have been used in the past to affect the demographics of municipalities. Racial segregation in the United States was further enforced by restrictive covenants that barred properties from being sold to people of specific ethnicities. The practice was prevalent in the 1920s and least through the 1940s. This allowed communities to limit the access that minorities had to housing in many cities across the country.
Some examples of racially restrictive covenants remain in some states, though they typically are no longer enforced. There may be cases where properties still list racially restrictive covenants to prevent minorities from purchasing the real estate and integrating the community. Such policies are no longer legal and should, if necessary, be challenged in court.
Restrictive covenants were once used for racial discrimination, specifically forbidding the sale of properties to certain minorities. This practice is no longer legal.
Mortgage lending discrimination is illegal. If you think you've been discriminated against based on race, religion, sex, marital status, use of public assistance, national origin, disability, or age, there are steps you can take. One such step is to file a report to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and/or with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).