Voidable Contract Definition: How It Works, With Examples

What Is a Voidable Contract?

A voidable contract is a formal agreement between two parties that may be rendered unenforceable for any number of legal reasons, which may include:

  • Failure by one or both parties to disclose a material fact
  • A mistake, misrepresentation, or fraud
  • Undue influence or duress
  • One party's legal incapacity to enter a contract (e.g., a minor)
  • One or more terms that are unconscionable
  • A breach of contract

The legal right to void such a contract is known as disaffirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • A voidable contract is one that can be canceled or altered for qualified legal reasons.
  • Not all contracts are voidable; legal precedent must exist to absolve responsibility.
  • Finding a defect in a contract is a common way to void that contract.
  • The simplest way to void a contract is for both parties to agree that voiding is the best option.

How Voidable Contracts Work

A voidable contract is initially considered legal and enforceable but can be rejected by one party if the contract is discovered to have defects. If a party with the power to reject the contract chooses not to reject the contract despite the defect, the contract remains valid and enforceable.

Most often, only one of the parties is adversely affected by agreeing to a voidable contract in which that party fails to recognize the misrepresentation or fraud made by the other party.

Voidable vs. Void Contracts

A voidable contract occurs when one of the involved parties would not have agreed to the contract originally if they had known the true nature of all of the elements of the contract prior to original acceptance. With the presentation of new knowledge, the aforementioned party has the opportunity to reject the contract after the fact. Alternatively, a contract is voidable when one or both parties were not legally capable of entering into the agreement—for example, when one party is a minor.

In contrast, a void contract is inherently unenforceable. A contract may be deemed void should the terms require one or both parties to participate in an illegal act, or if a party becomes incapable of meeting the terms as set forth, such as in the event of one party’s death.

A contract that is deemed voidable can be corrected through the process of ratification. Contract ratification requires all involved parties to agree to new terms that effectively remove the initial point of contention that was present in the original contract.

If it was later discovered that one of the parties was not capable of entering into a legally enforceable contract when the original was approved, for example, that party can choose to ratify the contract when they are deemed legally capable.

A contract may be ruled null and void should the terms require one or both parties to participate in an illegal act, or if one party becomes incapable of meeting the contract terms.

Examples of Potentially Voidable Contracts

Certain smartphone apps, categorized as freemium apps, begin as free downloads but later allow for in-app purchases costing real money. Freemium apps geared toward children may result in a minor accepting the terms and conditions associated with gameplay, though these terms may allow for the later solicitation of in-app purchases. This type of activity led to a lawsuit against Apple (AAPL) in 2012, which suggested the transactions were part of a voidable contract.

In a more recent example, a 2018 New Mexico lawsuit alleged that solar power installer Vivint Solar defrauded customers by binding them to 20-year contracts that required consumers to purchase the electricity generated by solar systems placed on their homes at rates that increase by more than 72% during the 20-year period. The lawsuit sought to render all Vivint's prior contracts with homeowners as voidable if affected customers wanted to cancel them. But that was not included in a settlement agreement between the New Mexico attorney general and Vivint in May 2021.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. "In Re Apple in-App Purchase Litigation, Case No. 5-11-CV-1758 EJD." Accessed Sept. 23, 2020.

  2. New Mexico Attorney General's Office. "AG Balderas Sues Massive Solar Company for Defrauding New Mexicans & Jeopardizing Their Home Ownership." Accessed Aug. 4, 2021.

Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.