Wage Gaps by Race

Companies may champion equal opportunity; paychecks don't reflect this.

With much of its early history rooted in the free labor of enslaved Africans and Native Americans, income inequality in the United States has a history substantially older than the country itself. Efforts to close these wage gaps are far more recent. The key law, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is just 56 years old. It banned compensation discrimination due to "race, color, religion, sex or national origin." Then in 2009 came the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which amended prior changes to several federal laws protecting the rights of workers and further clarified that all inequitable, discriminatory payments are illegal, regardless of how long ago those pay decisions or practices occurred.

Passing laws is an important step toward societal change, but often these laws do not in themselves produce or complete that change. That's not to say there hasn't been any progress. But such progress as has occurred has not reached all groups or been experienced equally. For instance, Native American wage growth and employment continue to decline—factors that contribute to a high poverty rate (one out of three) and an annual median income of only $23,000 per year. Additionally, over the majority of the last 50 years, African Americans have experienced recessionary-level unemployment rates and widespread residential segregation.

Clearly, despite everything that has changed over the past 56 years, substantial discriminatory earning gaps among various population sectors persist. The largest wage gap by far is by race.

Key Takeaways

  • The wage gap represents the unfair divergence between the pay of different groups of people, often by demographic characteristics.
  • Overall, Asian workers have the highest median weekly income, followed by White, Black, and Latinx workers.
  • The opportunity gap—unequal employment opportunities among various groups—is another socioeconomic divide.

Understanding the Wage Gap

According to the Cambridge Dictionary, a wage gap is "the difference between the average pay of two different groups of people." Consistent income inequality can lead to a population group or groups amassing more wealth than others. Among the organizations that track these kinds of wage gaps are the Federal Reserve, the Economic Policy Institute, and the Urban Institute.

Some pay gaps can be explained by factors such as differences in education and geographic location. However, even when you control for such factors, wage disparities remain prevalent. Intentional, system-wide laws and practices underlie these differences and have helped create them.

For example, several deregulatory legal edicts, including the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, created a high-risk economic environment that eventually led to a sudden, massive withdrawal of credit that ultimately resulted in the Financial Crisis of 2007–08, further exacerbating existing inequalities. Discriminatory recruitment practices have also played a prominent role in perpetuating wage gaps, particularly with regard to high-paying professions. For instance, African Americans are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math careers.

According to a 2018 study from the Pew Research Center, 72% of Black STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) professionals cite discrimination in recruitment, hiring, and promotions as a major causative factor. Also causative and earlier in the process: 73% of these professionals report being less likely to have access to quality education that prepares them for these careers—another result of the nation's income inequality and the unequal educational system that property-tax-based school funding produces.

Let's look at these wage disparities in more detail.

Overall Median Wages

There are notable wage gaps among American workers by race. Those of Asian ancestry have a higher weekly median income than White, Black, and Latinx individuals, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics data for Q4 of 2020. In addition, men generally earn more than women.

Black and Latinx workers have the lowest weekly median income, with Black men and women making more than Latinx men and women, respectively. This has obvious consequences: according to our research, Black and Latinx families were twice as likely to have no (or negative) wealth in 2016, according to a 2020 study from the Institute for Policy Studies.

Note also that the higher earnings of some Asian Americans don't mean that all Asian Americans earn more. According to a 2016 study from the Center for American Progress, there is much greater wealth inequality among Asian Americans than among White Americans. Non-wealthy Asian Americans are poorer than their White counterparts, and wealthy families are richer.

White workers make up the largest segment of the U.S job market and Asian Americans the smallest.

Does Education Help?

So what happens to the wage gap if you control for education: Does it shrink or go away? Yes and no. For instance, median annual earnings for workers with a bachelor's degree or higher in 2016 followed a nearly identical pattern to the overall median weekly income chart above. Asian workers earned the most, followed by White, Black, and Latinx workers. In all cases where educational attainment was limited to an associate's degree or less, White workers ended up earning more than Asian ones. Similarly, Black workers with an associate's degree or lower earned less than Latinx or Asian workers.

Education does make a difference: The gaps are narrower than they are for workers overall when a constant amount of experience and identical job titles are accounted for, though it once again follows the overall pattern. Between 2017 and 2019, Black men earned "98 cents for every dollar earned by men of other races with the same experience and education doing the same job in the same location," according to 2020 research from SHRM (the Society of Human Resources Management). This results in 99 cents for Latinos, $1 for White men, and $1.02 for Asian men.

Similar research shows a deeper earnings divide across job titles between men and women, particularly for Black women. In 2016, the National Women's Law Center found that Black women in low-wage occupations earned approximately $21,700 annually, compared to $36,000 annually for White men in the same positions. In terms of higher-paying jobs, "such as lawyers, engineers, and physicians or surgeons," Black women earned approximately $70,000 annually, compared to $110,000 annually for White men in the same positions, the study reported.

The Opportunity Gap

Looking deeper at the origins of the wage gap, one encounters another socioeconomic divide that affects a person's earning potential: the opportunity gap. This concept "refers to the ways in which race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, English proficiency, community wealth, familial situations, or other factors contribute to or perpetuate lower educational aspirations, achievement, and attainment for certain groups of students." It has obvious professional consequences clearly connected to income inequality.

One clear part of the opportunity gap is the unequal distribution of social capital, based on people's personal relationships and networks, across different classes, races, and other groups. Upward economic mobility can be difficult to achieve without access to social networks that provide connections and interactions with high-earning individuals and/or institutions. Simply put, having friends, family members, or other social connections in high places makes it easier to secure job opportunities, such as by having a contact willing to provide referrals to potential employers.

Further contributing to the opportunity gap are the ways people are recruited into particular fields and which groups benefit from them. For instance, high-paying careers, such as the majority of STEM professions, typically require some form of post-secondary education. Research published in The American Scientist notes that a lack of peers, senior mentorship, and culturally relevant educational programming has been shown to discourage minority students from completing their STEM programs.

Then, as the Pew study showed, there's the sheer racism in the job market encountered by those seeking employment. For instance, a 2016 study by researchers at the University of Toronto and Stanford University reported that resumes were 30% to 50% less likely to lead to job callbacks from employers if they contained "minority racial cues," such as names typically associated with Black or Asian identities. The researchers went on to replicate those findings in a 1,600-resume study of their own.

Occupational Segregation and Unemployment

Another aspect of the racial income gap is occupational segregation, which occurs when a demographic group is overrepresented or underrepresented across and within certain occupations. For example, Black men are more often employed in lower-paying industries than White men, who are far more likely to occupy high-paying senior positions. Of all the Fortune 500 CEOs in 2018, fewer than 3% were Black or had a Hispanic heritage.

And finally, unemployment plays a major role in income disparity: A December 2019 study comparing Black and White workers from the Center for American Progress reports that the employed share of Black workers between November 2018 and October 2019 was 75.7%. The figure for White workers during the same period was 80.8%.

The Bottom Line

Despite ever-increasing efforts to promote equal opportunity and diversity within the U.S. labor market, race and gender discrimination remains pervasive. If companies are truly committed to fostering real social change, a good place to start is by eliminating any bias that prevents everyone from being paid a fair and equitable wage for their work.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. NPR. "Forgotten History: How the New England Colonists Embraced the Slave Trade."

  2. U.S. Employment Opportunity Commission. "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964."

  3. Congress.gov. "S.181 - Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009."

  4. Institute for Policy Research. "What Drives Native American Poverty?"

  5. Joint Economic Committee. "The Economic State of Black America in 2020," Pages 2, 5, and 15.

  6. Cambridge Dictionary. "Meaning of Pay Gap in English."

  7. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. "Search Results."

  8. Economic Policy Institute. "Search Results for Racial Wealth Gap."

  9. Urban Institute. "Simple Search."

  10. Economic Policy Institute. "Education inequalities at the school starting gate."

  11. Washington Center for Equitable Growth. "Geography of economic inequality."

  12. Emory. "The Rise and Rise of the One Percent: Considering Legal Causes of Wealth Inequality."

  13. Pew Research Center. "Blacks in STEM Jobs Are Especially Concerned About Diversity and Discrimination in the Workplace."


  15. Institute for Policy Studies. "Dreams Deferred." Page 12.

  16. Inequality.org. "Racial Economic Inequality."

  17. Center for American Progress. "Wealth Inequality Among Asian Americans Greater Than Among Whites."

  18. National Center for Education Statistics. "Indicator 30: Earnings and Employment."

  19. SHRM, citing PayScale. "Black Workers Still Earn Less than Their White Counterparts."

  20. National Women's Law Center. "Equal Pay for Black Women."

  21. The Glossary of Education Reform. "OPPORTUNITY GAP."

  22. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. "The Role of Social Capital in Supporting Economic Mobility," Page 2.

  23. Center on Education and the Workforce. "Recovery," Page 16.

  24. American Scientist. "How to Recruit and Retain Underrepresented Minorities."

  25. Administrative Science Quarterly. "Whitened Résumés: Race and Self-Presentation in the Labor Market," Page 2.

  26. Washington Center for Equitable Growth. "Fact sheet: Occupational segregation in the United States."

  27. Center for American Progress. "African Americans Face Systematic Obstacles to Getting Good Jobs."

Take the Next Step to Invest
The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace.